Phrases you'd like to ban

2

Comments

  • edited November 2006
    George W. Bush's wife Laura once gave a very funny speech where she said "I actually know how to pronounce nuclear".

    What really worried me was when Blair started saying "nu-killer" instead of "nuclear".

    I'm more concerned about Bush's hatred of tourism. He keeps making speeches about the "War on Tourism", and how he he doesn't like Tourists. Makes you not want to visit the USofA.


    Back to phrases to ban... any quote from Little Britain.
  • edited November 2006
    Great an interesting thread at last !!! :D :D

    'Aww Blesss' A very patronising way of saying... how cute
    'Yeahh Enit' Why can't you just day I agree!?"
    'I'll see you then then' One to many thens
    'Pushing the envelope' Bullsh!t office talk from w*nk middle managers
    'Think outside the Box' Bullsh!t office talk from w*nk middle managers
    I'm [inset word here] at [insert word here] me For example I'm crap at sport me... I love music me.... Why the needless 'me'?

    or people that put mate at end of a sentence when they dont even know you 'Sorry didn't see you there mate' or 'it's not my problem mate'.

    and finaly

    'At the end of the day...' .... yes that is one of the ones I hate...
    Calling all ASCII Art Architects Visit the WOS Wall of Text and contribute: https://www.yourworldoftext.com/wos
  • edited November 2006
    actually if there is one phrase that I FUCKING HATE...

    "it's definately not Stonkers"

    and all variations thereof.
  • edited November 2006
    Return to Form

    as in Attack of the Clones was a return to form when in fact it was the worst of the lot.
  • edited November 2006
    chop983 wrote:
    Return to Form

    as in Attack of the Clones was a return to form when in fact it was the worst of the lot.

    Are you seriously saying that the Phantom Menace was better than AOTC??
  • edited November 2006
    Daren wrote:
    Are you seriously saying that the Phantom Menace was better than AOTC??

    it was loads better.

    jar jar could act hayden christian off screen anyday.
  • edited November 2006
    Another in the "management" line is one I saw on out company's newletter... "We need to redouble our efforts". What? So we doubled them, then halved them, and now we need to double them again? Make your minds up!
  • edited November 2006
    Daren wrote:
    Are you seriously saying that the Phantom Menace was better than AOTC??

    I think we can reasonably consider them equal worst.
  • edited November 2006
    Daren wrote:
    Are you seriously saying that the Phantom Menace was better than AOTC??

    Yes I actually like PM and find AOTC boring

    anyway I want to ban all phrases that use the word 'solutions'

    e.g. I've just been to the post office and they don't sell envelopes anymore they sell mailing solutions.

    it's mostly used in internet/computer/e-commerce(another for the ban list) but is now invading into everyday life.

    also ban anything which begins with i and try's to link itself with ipod which has taken over from everything that was either x-something or something-files.

    my 2p.
  • edited November 2006
    chop983 wrote:
    also ban anything which begins with i and try's to link itself with ipod which has taken over from everything that was either x-something or something-files.
    I'd just like to point out that I have never associated myself with Apple.
    All the best, icaPod.
  • edited November 2006
    What about resfuse disposal operative...... Why not just f**king bin man..

    Oh no bin man.... thats not PC, O.K. bin person then.
    Calling all ASCII Art Architects Visit the WOS Wall of Text and contribute: https://www.yourworldoftext.com/wos
  • edited November 2006
    Scottie_uk wrote:

    Oh no bin man.... thats not PC, O.K. bin person then.

    i think you mean tramp. or to be more PC 'a street dwelling scrat bag'
  • edited November 2006
    Another annoying one is when they call someone Vertically challenged instead of Short.

    In that case what does horisontaly challenged mean.... to fat?... to thin?..... small dick??
    Calling all ASCII Art Architects Visit the WOS Wall of Text and contribute: https://www.yourworldoftext.com/wos
  • edited November 2006
    Scottie_uk wrote:
    Another annoying one is when they call someone Vertically challenged instead of Short.

    In that case what does horisontaly challenged mean.... to fat?... to thin?..... small dick??

    i tried to horizontally challenge a lady, but i got into trouble.
  • edited November 2006
    mile wrote:
    i tried to horizontally challenge a lady, but i got into trouble.


    From what I can see by your myspace account you have challenged quite a few ladies. :D
    Calling all ASCII Art Architects Visit the WOS Wall of Text and contribute: https://www.yourworldoftext.com/wos
  • edited November 2006
    Scottie_uk wrote:
    From what I can see by your myspace account you have challenged quite a few ladies. :D

    i wish

    ...............
  • edited November 2006
    See, I quite like political correctness. You just add "challenged" to anything that someone isn't.

    One I like is the fact that you're not allowed to say that someone of a "darker skin tone" than yourself is "black" or "coloured". Logically they must be Caucasionally Challenged.

    Gay people are Heterosexually Challenged.

    Mass murderers are Pacifistically Challenged.


    Quality.
  • edited November 2006
    And of course Mile is sexually challenged. Every time he tries it :p
  • edited November 2006
    It's annoying when people add "st" (or just "t") to certain words ... especially "across" ... "acrosst" ... ?!?!?!

    Annoying as heck.

    Probably just a midwestern (USA) colloquialism.
  • edited November 2006
    At the end of the day, the bottom line is, use of clich?s should be avoided like the plague. :lol:

    Two which get up my nose:

    "I could care less" when the speaker/writer means "couldn't". That's another idiot Americanism which the Internet has made popular.

    "Denary" -- what's wrong with saying "decimal integer", or just "integer", which is all that's needed most of the time? And related errors such as referring to the "decimal part" of a number -- there's no such thing; a number either is decimal, or isn't (most likely because it's hexadecimal).
    I never make misteaks mistrakes misyales errurs — oh, sod it.
  • edited November 2006
    mile wrote:

    we used to have a womens lib in england, until they realised burning their bra's weren't gonna land them a rich husband.

    Love over money? Just doesn't work - in the end.

    What's the Oxford Dictionary like - I've got the 1960 edition & it just leaves those American-isms for dead (by excluding those words). Do recent editions stand by those rules?

    The other Dictionary I've got (which should be banned from Schools - as that's where I got mine from 1991), is the MacQuarie Dictionary. It's supposed to be an Australian Dictionary yet there's more American-isms to poke a stick at.

    CP/M User.
  • edited November 2006
    While we're at it how about banning the term "Stereo Typing" or "Stereo Type". I must prefer the other Stereo! :-D
  • edited November 2006
    I agree - I hate the phrase 'At the end of the day' ... even worse... 'At t'end of dair' (as heard on Jeremy Kyle)


    Also...

    'And he turned around to me and said...'

    'Summfink'
  • edited November 2006
    DEATH wrote:
    Do you have Women's lib in India Arjun? For some reason, that surprises me. I have no clue as to why either....

    Oh yes. Very passionate about their cause too! Thankfully, not all of them are as eager to burn men on stakes. :)
  • edited November 2006
    the fact that none of you reacted when I said that the '...Stonkers' phrase is the worst means you are ALL GUILTY!
  • edited November 2006
    I agree - I hate the phrase 'At the end of the day' ... even worse... 'At t'end of dair' (as heard on Jeremy Kyle)

    How about: "At the end of the day, it gets dark"? :smile:
  • edited November 2006
    Bluce_Ree wrote:
    the fact that none of you reacted when I said that the '...Stonkers' phrase is the worst means you are ALL GUILTY!
    We may be guilty, but at least we're not Stonkers.
  • edited November 2006
    icabod wrote:
    We may be guilty, but at least we're not Stonkers.

    you's right, at the end of the day we's aint no stonkers.!!!
  • edited November 2006
    We're definitely not stonkees either.
  • edited November 2006
    What are Stonkers / Stonkees anyhow?
    Calling all ASCII Art Architects Visit the WOS Wall of Text and contribute: https://www.yourworldoftext.com/wos
Sign In or Register to comment.