Apostrophe's

edited March 2008 in Chit chat
Incorrect punctuation annoys me. The title of the thread was supposed to be ironic.
Post edited by chev on
«1

Comments

  • edited July 2007
    what about spelling?

    'well saved' :p
  • edited July 2007
    aowen wrote: »
    I can live with that. And give me a chance to edit my post before you reply next time!

    how long do you need in future?
  • edited July 2007
    aowen wrote: »
    Real time forum discussions are new to me, but non-linear as well! I like it!

    you quoted me quite quickly b4 i had time to edit.
  • edited July 2007
    Dave Barry said it the best:
    An apostrophe doesn't mean "Yikes! Look out! Here comes an 'S'"
  • edited July 2007
    aowen wrote: »
    About an extra 30 seconds. I only noticed the error after I'd posted and had to go into advanced mode to fix it.

    I haven`t got an advanced mode :( I think that`s where I go wrong :lol:

    I`ve got :-

    Sober
    Drunk
    Silly
    Stupid
    and asleep.

    and stoned ;)
  • RNDRND
    edited July 2007
    Get the spelling checker add-on for firefox :D
    Facebook @nick.swarfega Twitter: @sw4rfega
  • edited July 2007
    aowen wrote: »
    Took me forever to get the hang of 'tomorrow' as well.

    Et tu? I myself have got the hang of 'tomorrow' until recently. And oh, in your 30 second edit fix you missed 'excessive'. ;)
  • edited July 2007
    Its amusing that you have an unwanted apostrophe in your thread title.
    You have apostrophe's when it should just be apostrophes.

    ...or was that on purpose?
  • edited July 2007
    so'rry AoWeN' I' Won't D'o I.t Ag-,n
    Professional Mel-the-Bell Simulator................"So realistic, I found myself reaching for the Kleenex King-Size!" - Richard Darling
  • edited July 2007
    aowen wrote: »
    Indeed.

    I'm likely to call them spuds and toms to avoid Dan Quale's infamous mistake. Took me forever to get the hang of 'tomorrow' as well. Too many years as a sub-editor I guess.

    Shouldn't toms be tom's, as it is the abbreviated form ?
  • edited July 2007
    murtceps wrote: »
    Shouldn't toms be tom's, as it is the abbreviated form ?

    No; tom's would mean something belonging to tom.
  • edited July 2007
    Daren wrote: »
    No; tom's would mean something belonging to tom.


    No that would be Tom's with a capital T.

    Example if Tom was a greengrocer - Tom's tomatoes.

    Or if Tom was a drummer Tom's tom-toms.



    Time to stop...................
  • edited July 2007
    murtceps wrote: »
    No that would be Tom's with a capital T.

    Example if Tom was a greengrocer - Tom's tomatoes.

    Or if Tom was a drummer Tom's tom-toms.



    Time to stop...................

    Erm, you originally quoted:

    "Shouldn't toms be tom's, as it is the abbreviated form ?"

    That looks very much like a lower case 't' to me. Hence why I also used a lower case 't' in my reply.

    And anyway, the original context of 'tom' wasn't as a proper noun, as it was to do with tomatoes, so no capital letter was required.
  • edited July 2007
    The problem with the apostrophe is that its usage has been hopelessly overloaded. It's no wonder that people get confused about when to use it.

    The only way to fix improper usage these days would be to remove it and replace it with at least three new punctuation marks.
  • edited July 2007
    murtceps wrote: »
    Shouldn't toms be tom's, as it is the abbreviated form ?

    AAARRRGGGHHHH!!!! NOOOOOO!

    I share Andrew's apostrophe abuse distress.

    Strangley, I also share his difficulty with the word 'tomorrow'. Every time I want to write it I try hard to get the spelling right...

    ...but tomorrow never comes.

    I'll get my coat...

    C.
  • edited July 2007
    James' torch.


    or why not...

    James's torch.

    why should James have to stick his apostrophe at the end of his name, just because it already ends in s? He should be allowed to keep his own s, and add another one, just like everyone else does. No one else has to use one of their own letters.


    Poor fella, I bet he feels all singled out.
  • edited July 2007
    Apostrophes don't bother me that much at all.

    It's the whole your/you're thing that gets me really steamed up...
  • edited July 2007
    Malc74 wrote: »
    Apostrophes don't bother me that much at all.

    It's the whole your/you're thing that gets me really steamed up...

    what i do is say it to myself. so i say your and you are, and the one that sounds right i use. (don't do it out loud or people will think you're a nut case)

    or i just write ur
  • edited August 2007
    Seen on BBC News 24 this morning:

    "British Airways Fine"

    I don't expect they are fine after being found guilty of price-fixing... ;-)

    Surely that should either be "British Airways' Fine" or "British Airways Fined".

    Cheers, Simon
  • edited August 2007
    Capital F? Perhaps it should be, British Airways. Fine.
  • edited August 2007
    Let it go....the English language is formed from a corruption of others....it's dynamic and I will continue to do my part in corrupting it further and keep it as a work in progress.

    If you don''''''t like it don''''t read it!
  • edited August 2007
    ha ha, thats true though, the oed is always being revised, waste of money i say. the gov should put a cap on new words.

    and why does the dictionary contain the word 'dictionary'. the spelling is on the front of the book, and why would you look for the meaning???
  • edited August 2007
    ...having said that what bugs me is having to spell things differently here and I often mix them up.

    Color/colour
    Theater/theatre
    Center/centre
    check/cheque
    ass/arse
    Small furry creature from Alpha Centuri/Bill Oddie
    etc.

    Oh the date thing got me in a lot of trouble at first too...

    Here it's month/day/year there it's day/month/year. (8/1/07 Aug 1st here is Jan 8th there)

    so filling forms/checks out can be problematic if I go on autopilot.
  • edited August 2007
    beanz wrote: »
    Here it's month/day/year there it's day/month/year. (8/1/07 Aug 1st here is Jan 8th there)

    so filling forms/checks out can be problematic if I go on autopilot.

    ha ha, how much out of date milk have you drunk.
  • edited August 2007
    aowen wrote: »
    That's my number two gripe, after apostrophes. But the worst time is when I find myself doing it. Then I have to sit down with a really strong cup of coffee and count to ten.

    I wish i had your type of stress !
  • edited August 2007
    And what about the usage of the often misspelled (and freely mixed up):

    it's - its
    too - two - to

    and some other's i's donnot remembers' n'o'w's. Those DO (wasn't it DO'S? -Ed) get on my nerves...

    D'oh!

    *pick's ap'ostroph'es from floor and runs*
  • edited August 2007
    i always mix these words up


    love - lust
  • edited August 2007
    There, there. I hope they're over their silliness now, and that you're soon over your annoyance.
  • edited August 2007
    mile wrote: »
    i always mix these words up


    love - lust

    I find determining the meaning of sober and pissed a little blurred at times.

    yes and no often hold a challenge for me at times too:D
    Every night is curry night!
  • edited August 2007
    This topic makes me laugh, but also makes me remember I'm still learning. I'm always welcome to corrections. :)

    I don't understand why some people write 'to' instead of 'too', 'there' instead of 'their'. There's more, but these are the ones I see most of the time, especially in forums and irc. :)

    Oh, and then there are those who write everything in lower case and without any punctuation, or periods where there should be question marks, etc. Sometimes I have a hard time deciphering the messages. :grin:
    beanz wrote: »
    ...Small furry creature from Alpha Centuri/Bill Oddie
    etc.

    :lol:
Sign In or Register to comment.