P Diddy wants to be the new Bond

BigBadMick

Hee hee hee.

This is funny.

Here's his Bond audition video.

http://www.peoplestar.co.uk/index.html?watch=27

Somehow I don't think Daniel Craig's got anything to worry about.

That outfit he's wearing on the balcony makes him look like MC Hammer. SO un-Bond.

:D

ZnorXman

He can have the part all I care ...

Casion Royale was excellent compared to the dire crap Q.o.S. is ... I say give Daniel Craig one more chance, he shows much promise as Bond, James Bond, as long as the J.B.-powers that be do not shovel the same turds his way.

dm_boozefreek

BigBadMick wrote: »

Hee hee hee.

This is funny.

Here's his Bond audition video.

http://www.peoplestar.co.uk/index.html?watch=27

Somehow I don't think Daniel Craig's got anything to worry about.

That outfit he's wearing on the balcony makes him look like MC Hammer. SO un-Bond.

:D

I saw that on the page with the coldplay video, I didn't watch it :D

def chris

what could it be called?

I vote "Dr. Hell-No"

or maybe "Gold-Trigger-Finger"

dm_boozefreek

The man with the Golden Grill :D

def chris

dm_boozefreek wrote: »

The man with the Golden Grill :D

ha nice...


Diamonds Are Wu-Tang Forever

dm_boozefreek

ThunderBaller :lol:

def chris

Octopuffy

(or Octodiddy - both equally crap)

Tom-Cat

Whats with the new Bond films anyway? Casino Royale felt a bit like a Bond movie (just a bit), but Quantum doesn't feel like a Bond flick at all anymore. It is just another action movie... Basically no Q (or whatever his replacement is), no gadgets, no cool cars (with gadgets), no cool lines, very dark scenes, almost no high-tech stuff, no memorable moments, no nothing really :)

JamesW

Tom-Cat wrote: »

Whats with the new Bond films anyway? Casino Royale felt a bit like a Bond movie (just a bit), but Quantum doesn't feel like a Bond flick at all anymore. It is just another action movie... Basically no Q (or whatever his replacement is), no gadgets, no cool cars (with gadgets), no cool lines, very dark scenes, almost no high-tech stuff, no memorable moments, no nothing really :)

There were gadgets, just not silly invisible car type gadgets. In QoS Bond's phone had quite an impressive zoom for example. Toning down the gadgets is a return to older Bond movies. My favourite, From Russia With Love, was pretty conservative on the gadget front. The last two films have had Aston Martins present and correct, so the cars are there too. Casino Royale had a couple of decent quips. 'Yes... Considerably' in the pre-credits sequence was a good one. I think the days of naming a character Christmas, just to make a joke right at the end of the film are no more though! Not necessarily a bad thing either. Part of the reason for the new style of Bond is that Austin Powers was far to close to the mark.

As for P Diddy - I'll paraphrase a response I read on another forum. P Diddy isn't fit to be the lame henchman who gets his ass kicked by Bond in the five minutes before the credits.

ewgf

I don't know who P. Diddy is, but that video is beyond awful. Leaving aside the fact that the bloke looks nothing like Bond should (tough, determined, and moving like he owns the place, that bloke looked like a nobody who knew he was being filmed and wanted to look cool), the dialogue in that video was pathetic. And if, as I think, that video was supposed to convince us that he'd be great as Bond, then why didn't it actually include any Bond-type scenes?

I mean, we didn't see him fighting, we didn't see him shooting, posing dramatically. We didn't get to see him speak in character, or see him square up to an enemy. Instead we saw endless scenes of him with half-naked women (which only happens for a very short length of time in the Bond films), a couple of shots of him on a jet-ski and in a helicopter (but not long enough for us to see if he looked like he could handle one in a chase scene), and he was constantly wearing sunglasses (erm, that's not Bond), and he wore big gold chains and stuff. Again, not Bond.

Going by that, I'd accept Stephen Hawking as Bond before I'd accept this Diddy bloke. At least Hawking doesn't have a "look at me, I'm so cool" expression on his face.

psj3809

You seriously do not know who P Diddy is ? I'm no fan of his music at all, dont own any of his albums/singles, dont intentionally watch any of his videos on tv but i'm sure an eskimo without electricity in the north pole will still know who P Diddy is ?

Whos Stephen Hawking by the way ? Was he in an 80's band ?

psj3809

ewgf wrote: »

And if, as I think, that video was supposed to convince us that he'd be great as Bond, then why didn't it actually include any Bond-type scenes?

I mean, we didn't see him fighting, we didn't see him shooting, posing dramatically. We didn't get to see him speak in character, or see him square up to an enemy. Instead we saw endless scenes of him with half-naked women (which only happens for a very short length of time in the Bond films), a couple of shots of him on a jet-ski and in a helicopter (but not long enough for us to see if he looked like he could handle one in a chase scene), and he was constantly wearing sunglasses (erm, that's not Bond), and he wore big gold chains and stuff. Again, not Bond.

You are joking right ? You seriously think it was an audition video for playing James bond ? I think we need to have some smilies as i cant tell if youre joking or not. Come on ewgf, stop pulling my leg, you honestly honestly think that was some sort of audition for P Diddy to become the next James Bond ???