Proof of time travel?
A woman is seen at a premier of a Charlie Chaplin movie, in 1920, talking into a MOBILE PHONE!!!
http://uk.movies.yahoo.com/blog/article/57334/time-traveller-spotted-at-chaplin-premiere.html
Well, it looks more like a bloke to me. And I'm not exactly convinced its a mobile phone, or even anything there at all.
Still, it's clearer than 99% of the photos of video that convince [/strike]lunat[/ strike] reasonable people that Big Foot/The Loch Ness Monster/fairies/aliens who fly around near bars at night in America and abduct drunken people to probe them and then release them to tell the world (those daft enough to listen) their "story".
Anyway, watch the film, it's an amusing "Yeah right" thing to show your mates.
http://uk.movies.yahoo.com/blog/article/57334/time-traveller-spotted-at-chaplin-premiere.html
Well, it looks more like a bloke to me. And I'm not exactly convinced its a mobile phone, or even anything there at all.
Still, it's clearer than 99% of the photos of video that convince [/strike]lunat[/ strike] reasonable people that Big Foot/The Loch Ness Monster/fairies/aliens who fly around near bars at night in America and abduct drunken people to probe them and then release them to tell the world (those daft enough to listen) their "story".
Anyway, watch the film, it's an amusing "Yeah right" thing to show your mates.
Post edited by ewgf on
Comments
if time travel is possible, how come we never meet anyone from the future? :-o
Seriously. I don't care if she is or isn't, the suggestion alone is great!
Oh that ones going to keep people aguing for years! :lol:
Hey, maybe she's that woman who tried to warn the government about the hindenburg blowing up when she saw it in a vision of the future? maybe she saw people on mobile phones in a vision and was copting what they were doing?
OR... maybe she's just some old loony who wonders round talking into a shell she found on the beach?
http://www.worldofspectrum.org/forums/showthread.php?t=19984&page=199
grey key mentioned it there...and then I posted a lovely pic of some other supposed time tourist...go on, click that bit above....
Oh, and it's not a mobile phone...it's a walkie talkie... :lol:
Did she travel with another Mobile phone bearing friend.
Oh and whilst we're at it did they take a few transmitters/receiver antenaes with them back in time.
nah, just needs a quick zap with a sonic screwdriver and your good for temporal roaming. :p
The absence of a conventional cellphone network is irrelevant, since the time-traveller would obviously not be using a cellphone, it's some sort of transmitter, yes, but presumably single link directly to the mother-time machine, or at least the home base, almost certainly in the same time zone as the time traveller, as temporal communications would probably be fraught with difficulties.
On the other hand, the hand that's not got eight pints of alcohol in it's blood stream, it's just an old film showing someone scrathing their head or holding their hat or straightening their wig, or perhaps it's just some eccentric old person clutching his/her ear and talking to themselves.
I wouldn't trust the judgment of anyone who truly thought that this was evidence of time travel, I just posted the link as it's interesting since (a) it poses an interesting (albeit not too serious question - is (s)he a time traveller), and (b) it's a much better image that the black shape on a grey image that conspiracy theorists usually claim is absolute proof of Dracula/aliens from Saturn/government made military eighteen foot high androids/leprechauns that warned us all years ago about the impending financial mess the banks we getting us in to (but would we listen? Those poor leprechauns might as well of not bothered)/eighth century texts that predict the future with total accuracy (and yet, their meaning only ever becomes clear after the events take place, before hand none of their absolute believers can interpret the texts and say exactly what they mean..../etc.
I do think it's fairly interesting, but I don't attach the slightest bit of credibility to it. I can't say that time travel is impossible, as I don't know, though I think it probably is, going by both what far cleverer people than me say, and also by the fact that I don't know of any timetravellers coming back from the future, although I realise that those two points don't exactly constitute definite, 100% solid proof.
But that video is far to inconclusive and open to other interpretations, and indeed the fact that it's taken this long for anyone to notice it shows strongly how weak it is as evidence of any anachronism. Plus if (s)he was a time traveller, then even if that person needed to use a handheld communicator, surely they'd not only have not done so on camera, but not in front of anyone at all, and certainly not in the open street?
Still an interesting thought, though, isn't it? Looking through an old photograph and seeing something that couldn't possibly have been around at that time? It would be weird, and a little unnerving, but very interesting.
if you can move matter backwards and forwards in time, I doubt moving radio waves would pose much of a technological problem ;)
I dont know the egzact terminology but in this game you see your movements beside, in the same way as super mario, but here you can move to the left to! :D
Wrong thread and btw ...
Don't ask the same question 3 times!
Moscow underground:
In one of the paintings in the picture there's an interesting thing...
errrm, maybe talking with a mobile phone while working with a notebook?????
... or maybe shaving in front of a mirror? :-)
senseless, in both cases.
Salamanca, Spain:
If you visit the cathedral (built c XVI - XVIII) , you can see in one of the main doors:
an astronaut???????
http://hearing.siemens.com/sg/10-about-us/01-our-history/milestones.jsp?year=1924
He's probably talking to the woman in the Charlie Chaplin movie:-)
Or just an old-fashioned compact ear-trumpet.
- IONIAN-GAMES.com -
Here they are now....
..and here they are on a church built around 1140AD....
..and Mickey Mouse was found during the excavation of an Iron Age settlement that's around 1100 years old...
:lol:
an hellicopter, a tank and a submarine?????
I don't know if it is true or not, but as somenone said before, the suggestion alone is great!
As for the Chaplin film, I think it's a fake. I have the rule of not believe most stuff that comes from Internet. Maybe viral marketing? a mobile company?
I think that the Seti I temple is a viral marketing ploy for a munitions manufacturer, they just simply travelled back in time and put it there, it just proves, don't believe everything you see, or read;-)
Bollocks! :p
http://www.worldofspectrum.org/forums/member.php?u=2
Anonymous, who joined this forum in 1978!
That's just a unix date fail. It stores time / date as one number (seconds since 01/01/70) :)
This is an interesting thread though :) , have read with interest.
KFC SPOTTED IN CORNER OF 'THE HAY WAIN'