Ie9

zx1zx1
edited May 2011 in Chit chat
Has anyone here used IE9 yet? Is it better than IE8 which i'm using at the moment. I'm wondering whether to upgrade my internet browser or wait till they iron out most of the bugs.
Post edited by zx1 on
The trouble with tribbles is.......

Comments

  • edited May 2011
    It's a massive improvement over IE8, definitely worth the upgrade.
  • edited May 2011
    Yep - I use IE9 and it is brilliant. Well worth upgrading.
  • edited May 2011
    Better off upgrading to chrome - its quicker and has more CSS3/HTML5 features that websites are starting to use....
    My test signature
  • edited May 2011
    Speaking of Chrome, I saw this on the news yesterday:
    All users of Chrome should be aware now that this browser can be fully hacked despite its famous sandbox and despite all the marketing that Google has been doing around its security

    http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/attacks/229500086
    http://www.itpro.in/625858/webgl-security-flaw-attacks-chrome-and-firefox

    :razz:

    But this type of thing happens to all browsers once in a while. : )
  • edited May 2011
    I upgraded to IE9, took an instant dislike to it (after using all windows versions of Internet Explorer pretty-much exclusively other than for testing in the past), and promptly switched to chrome, which I've been using ever since.

    The only downside is that I use a couple of things that use browser-based ActiveX controls, but that is easily worked around by using the "IE Tab" plug-in (which you can get for both Chrome and FF).

    Main advantage for me of switching to Chrome is that it supports WebGL which is used by cool sites like this. <- That won't work in IE9. :)
  • edited May 2011
    ccowley wrote: »
    I upgraded to IE9, took an instant dislike to it (after using all windows versions of Internet Explorer pretty-much exclusively other than for testing in the past), and promptly switched to chrome, which I've been using ever since.

    The only downside is that I use a couple of things that use browser-based ActiveX controls, but that is easily worked around by using the "IE Tab" plug-in (which you can get for both Chrome and FF).

    Main advantage for me of switching to Chrome is that it supports WebGL which is used by cool sites like this. <- That won't work in IE9. :)

    Hmmm...can't say that I have ever needed 'Google Body' :-P
  • edited May 2011
    itsallgood wrote: »
    Hmmm...can't say that I have ever needed 'Google Body' :-P
    Seriously, you should take a look. It is absolutely fascinating the way you can peel away anatomical layers and look at the routing of blood vessels and the structure of the nervous system and stuff.
  • fogfog
    edited May 2011
    cool site, where is the bit where ya put the post code in :)

    works in firefox also , maybe it's the plugin only that you need ?
  • edited May 2011
    zxbruno wrote: »
    All users of Chrome should be aware now that this browser can be fully hacked despite its famous sandbox and despite all the marketing that Google has been doing around its security

    In fact it seems that it is only Windows users who use Chrome who are potentially at risk from this potential exploit. And you are still safer using Chrome than browsers that don't use sandboxing.
  • zx1zx1
    edited May 2011
    zxbruno wrote: »
    Speaking of Chrome, I saw this on the news yesterday:



    http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/attacks/229500086
    http://www.itpro.in/625858/webgl-security-flaw-attacks-chrome-and-firefox

    :razz:

    But this type of thing happens to all browsers once in a while. : )

    Hmm, think i'll stick to IE8 for a while longer, i was considering using Google Chrome but think i'll give it a miss (for now).
    The trouble with tribbles is.......
  • edited May 2011
    aowen wrote: »
    In fact it seems that it is only Windows users who use Chrome who are potentially at risk from this potential exploit. And you are still safer using Chrome than browsers that don't use sandboxing.

    IE9 runs in a lower than user privilege level (called Protected Mode) which offers the same benefits as Chrome. I think it's only Firefox that still fails to do any form of sandboxing on Windows these days.
  • edited May 2011
    AndyC wrote: »
    IE9 runs in a lower than user privilege level (called Protected Mode) which offers the same benefits as Chrome. I think it's only Firefox that still fails to do any form of sandboxing on Windows these days.

    As a professional web developer I can honestly say this doesn't stop IE9 from being ****.
    My test signature
Sign In or Register to comment.