vanessa redgrave and the "travellers"

fogfog
edited September 2011 in Chit chat
watching her talk about dale farm on the news... she must live on a different planet, she obviously never has lived near any travellers. She probably think they go around on horse drawn caravans still *shrugs*

"they look after their pensioners / old"... sure but were quite happy to rip ?1000's off a pensioner who was a family friend on fictitious building work.

"they are law abiding" .. squatting on green belt land , do they pay tax etc ?

why are so many of the not wanting to be on camera for the gypsy programmes.

she should spend a week around here.. she might learn different, silly mare
Post edited by fog on

Comments

  • edited August 2011
    who is dale farm?
  • edited August 2011
    no clue....but that doesn't sound the like pikeys I know and avoid
  • edited August 2011
    Whilst travellers have a bad reputation, I do believe that many house dwellers and the police perpetuate and contribute the problem with their prejudice, which creates an us and them culture.

    Often a traveller is stuck between a rock and a hard place, and therefore the only way to make any living to speak of is to be dishonest or become a non traveller with a fixed abode. If there were more honest ways to earn I'm sure they would. I'm not for one instant saying they are blameless, but then I think neither are the house dwellers and police, especially teenagers who stir up trouble.

    If the travellers keep being moved on, and with the lack of traveller sites and space within them, often a traveller has little choice than to find an unused strip of land.

    We what makes us think we are entitled to than others to use the land of this world. Its like saying the moon is ours because a law and well worded sheet of paper says so. At the end of the Zillenium we are just animals inhabiting a rock and have no more right to the land then any ant, crow or fish. If the political system we live in broke down completely, that's how it would be (albeit with an element of thug rule).
    Calling all ASCII Art Architects Visit the WOS Wall of Text and contribute: https://www.yourworldoftext.com/wos
  • mile wrote: »
    who is dale farm?

    DaleWinton.jpg
  • edited August 2011
    DaleWinton.jpg

    Oh in that case, I'm with the pikeys....
  • fogfog
    edited August 2011
    mile wrote: »
    who is dale farm?

    it's a place

    Scottie.. the ones near where I work are "settled" as such.. but they still a bunch of robbing gits. Half of them are barred from the place I'm at because they give being light fingered / tea leaf a new meaning

    my roots are Irish, so it's not a race thing.. it's more they are crooked..

    Vanessa redgrave is F'ing clueless about it.. she don't live anywhere near them . she might get an education if she did

    they shouldn't be living there, they knew that when they invaded the land.

    As much as they buy some green belt land and have it tarmacked within the weekend.. joke being it's probably a far better "job" than the half one they do for others.
  • What I don't understand is why these travellers are so reluctant to travel.
    How long have they been at that site now?
  • edited August 2011
    This is where he lives:

    ice_28165t.jpg
    Calling all ASCII Art Architects Visit the WOS Wall of Text and contribute: https://www.yourworldoftext.com/wos
  • edited August 2011
    Fog, you should be careful what you publish on the internet when talking about Romani people (or ?Gypsies?). They are officially considered an ethnic minority and have certainly been persecuted as such over the centuries. Re-read your original post but replace 'travellers' with 'blacks', 'jews' or 'Irish' to see how it could cause offence.
  • edited August 2011
    Scottie_uk wrote: »
    Whilst travellers have a bad reputation, I do believe that many house dwellers and the police perpetuate and contribute the problem with their prejudice, which creates an us and them
    If the travellers keep being moved on, and with the lack of traveller sites and space within them, often a traveller has little choice than to find an unused strip of land.

    We what makes us think we are entitled to than others to use the land of this world. Its like saying the moon is ours because a law and well worded sheet of paper says so. At the end of the Zillenium we are just animals inhabiting a rock and have no more right to the land then any ant, crow or fish. If the political system we live in broke down completely, that's how it would be (albeit with an element of thug rule).

    I'll remind you of that hippy answer when you have travellers living near you, your kids can't go to the local park due to travellers being there and then leaving it in a huge mess like a rubbish tip when they finally leave.

    How many times have you ever heard of travellers leaving somewhere and it's nice and tidy when they go?
  • edited August 2011
    psj3809 wrote: »
    I'll remind you of that hippy answer when you have travellers living near you, your kids can't go to the local park due to travellers being there and then leaving it in a huge mess like a rubbish tip when they finally leave.

    How many times have you ever heard of travellers leaving somewhere and it's nice and tidy when they go?

    I grew up on a council estate behind which was a permanent Gypsy camp. I remember we kept having our milk stolen, and peoples first thought was the Gippos. Turned out to be a bloke up the road, as I caught him (I was 7) one early morning when looking out the window to watch the street lamp turn off (I was a weird kid).

    It's about 50/50. In my security days I was often called upon to sit in an unmarked car and watch them when they parked on disused premises; I was mostly used in an observational capacity. Some left the site messy, but just as many took their stuff and left. In many instances it was because they were moved on in a hurry, in the early hours and often in hostile circumstances either by police who would pick the worst times of night to piss them off, or youths who would threaten to burn down their caravans. Partly they were pissed off and for good reason, its no wonder they did not tidy up.

    Give them enough safe places to go, of sufficient standard and this would happen much less, then moving them on from public places where they are unwanted would be a more just thing to do.

    The oddest thing I ever did see was a fourteen(ish) year old girl take a crap facing me half undressed (bottom half) in the open 10 meters from my patrol car, her knowing I was there.
    Calling all ASCII Art Architects Visit the WOS Wall of Text and contribute: https://www.yourworldoftext.com/wos
  • edited August 2011
    yeah they should be given designated areas etc. they are just as bad as people on estates for creating a mess. as scottie says though, it could be a case of 50/50. i assume not having proper bins etc causes a bit of a mess.

    where i used to live people kept moaning into the local paper about them ruining a green area. its a tesco now. lol
  • fogfog
    edited August 2011
    WhizzBang wrote: »
    Fog, you should be careful what you publish on the internet when talking about Romani people (or ?Gypsies?). They are officially considered an ethnic minority and have certainly been persecuted as such over the centuries. Re-read your original post but replace 'travellers' with 'blacks', 'jews' or 'Irish' to see how it could cause offence.

    THEY choose to take part in "big fat gypsy wedding"... to me they are travellers.. (and yep I do know the difference... hence the thread title) someone I know represents travellers (who is Irish) and it kinda makes me laugh for one of a better word.. they are the very same people who give Irish people (including my folks) a bad name.

    I am commenting solely on that silly woman portraying a none realistic versions of things... AND endorsing them lot breaking the law by her actions..

    if we did the same, we'd have been booted out within a week of squatting. so some twee actress who comes across as clueless makes me laugh. She has some fairy tale version.

    It's a bit like someone who is black can say something about someone who is black , they can't be accused of being racist. (hopefully that makes sense)

    mile wrote: »
    yeah they should be given designated areas etc. they are just as bad as people on estates for creating a mess. as scottie says though, it could be a case of 50/50.

    the local site around here, where they are "settled" has constantly got old caravans / cars dumped on the bus stop nearby.. the other "trick" is to pile a lorry up full of waste that no one will take.. tow it to a public street / dump it and the council foot the bill for their fly tipping . They also fly tip works car park as well .. and they are on CCTV doing it.

    WhizzBang, I can't imagine many travellers are in Sweden.. but other euro countries would be less tolerant of places being used as a dumping ground.

    the sole reason I put travellers in quotes was because they aren't doing travelling and haven't for years.
  • edited August 2011
    I'm all for proper Gypsies...but most "travellers" aren't even doing that...they're just better organised homeless folk trying to stay put on a bit of land they have no claim to. And it's not always the case that they have nowhere else to go...some just take a shine to a particular spot!

    Be interesting to see what would happen if they said "Yeah, you can have that land...but you have to let these homeless peeps have a bit of it too!"....I'd be interested to see what they said....

    There should be places where such groups can go though. Maybe set up travellers camps around the country, that actual travellers can flit between....But they should be made to stay for a minimum length of time if they decide to stay put in one spot, so as they don't just bugger off after a few years when the place gets too messed up even for them....And they shouldn't be allowed to claim Gypsy status unless they have proper heritage!

    There are big differences between Romani gypsies and travellers....and then of course you have "New Age travellers" which again, are totally different....

    Mind you, I'm only talking about my experiences of travelling types, which I have to admit are very few....and I would never say that I think they are all the same! There must be some decent types among them...but the majority's attitude and lack of respect for the actual landowners isn't doing them any favours....although some of the landowners could do with being a bit more diplomatic sometimes too!
  • edited August 2011
    WhizzBang wrote: »
    Fog, you should be careful what you publish on the internet when talking about Romani people (or ?Gypsies?). They are officially considered an ethnic minority and have certainly been persecuted as such over the centuries. Re-read your original post but replace 'travellers' with 'blacks', 'jews' or 'Irish' to see how it could cause offence.

    But they're not Romany they are what where known as tinkers years ago and they claim to be of Irish decent (bit like the Asian looking New Yorkers claiming to be Irish on St Patricks day).

    The ones are as much 'travelling folk' as I am they have built houses on designated green belt land without any planning permission and have been there for years.

    The 'race' card is always played.

    Unfortunately I have been on the receiving end of one of their 'good neighbour campaigns' which involved anything which wasn't nailed down being stolen (and even quite a few things which where nailed down come to think of it).

    I have known ones who are pretty good people, but the concept of laws actually applying to them (unless it's to their advantage) is laughable.

    Don't even start me about their claims that they have no money.

    Rant off
  • edited August 2011
    Think more people would actually be on their side and support them with 'they havent got anywhere to go....' if when they did plonk themselves down on some green land they didnt turn it into a huge waste tip once they left.

    My dads neighbour stupidly paid some gypsies to tarmac his drive (huge schoolboy error), cost a ton (cash of course) and started falling apart a week or two later. Utterly stupid of him to get them to do it though.

    Sorry but i havent heard any good stories from people i know about gypsies who camp somewhere illegally (then theres several break ins/thefts nearby) and then go leave a huge mess.

    I do agree they should have some large sites but the problem is no one wants it near their neighbourhood do they
  • edited August 2011
    psj3809 wrote: »

    I do agree they should have some large sites but the problem is no one wants it near their neighbourhood do they

    i may have mentioned this on here before, but it would be ideal next to my 'peadophille town' idea.
  • edited August 2011
    the-thieving-gypsy-bastards-large.png
  • edited August 2011
    mile wrote: »
    i may have mentioned this on here before, but it would be ideal next to my 'peadophille town' idea.

    :lol:

    If you ever run for government you can count on my vote
  • It's the horses I feel sorry for. Near where I live there are a few areas where 'travellers' camp and they tend to just tether their horses to the side of a fairly busy road. This is well away from the camp and (as far as I can see or have heard) they very rarely visit their horses or make sure they are well looked after with water etc. They are out in all weather and don't look very healthy. Sometimes the RSPCA (or some other group) give the horses a bit of a check up, but it's no life for them. I'm not averse to working animals as long as they are well fed and looked after but these don't even seem to serve much of a purpose.
  • edited August 2011
    Wookiee wrote: »
    :lol:

    If you ever run for government you can count on my vote

    unfortunatly this country has rules in place stopping people like me getting into government. ;)
  • edited August 2011
    ah don't worry, when I am Lord of All you can be my minister for paedos and undesirables....I was thinking we can dump em on France but hey whatever works
  • edited August 2011
    Wookiee wrote: »
    ah don't worry, when I am Lord of All you can be my minister for paedos and undesirables....I was thinking we can dump em on France but hey whatever works

    yeah send them to the place we send all our school children on holiday. :p

    the peado minister will not stand for that. ;)
  • edited August 2011
    mile wrote: »
    yeah send them to the place we send all our school children on holiday. :p

    the peado minister will not stand for that. ;)

    paedo.jpg
    paedofinder-general.JPG
  • edited September 2011
    Ooer... have we got to come up with new names for dodgy roofing workmen, tarmac gangs, and people that steal scrap metal?


    Maybe we should just call them 'the differently moralled' community (and celebrate their wonderful and diverse culture).
  • fogfog
    edited September 2011
    so now the travellers have got the UN saying to suspend the eviction of these green belt squatters.. claiming about ethnic clensing.. and "it could worsen the victimisation of the travellers"... them staying there "annoys me" far more.. because you know when they get turfed out , it'll be left as a tip.

    how about you illegally squatted on green belt land now f*** off.

    the council make me laugh, they should have just gone in there next day and got on with clearing it out.
  • edited September 2011
    Travellers?
    Go on then, let's see you travel.

    Idle f***ers.
    Joefish
    - IONIAN-GAMES.com -
  • edited September 2011
    all that ethnic cleansing in places like bosnia wasn't to keep the parks tidy.
  • edited September 2011
    Maybe we should just call them 'the differently moralled' community (and celebrate their wonderful and diverse culture).

    Nah! Cos' there's plenty of them c*nts live in houses :D
    Every night is curry night!
Sign In or Register to comment.