Tory Sleaze.
Its like the early 90's again. It seems a new story of Tory Sleaze breaks every day now . When will the PM and his band of theives and liars just f*ck off!
And then you hear of Julian Assange loosing his extradition appeal for some made up crime.
I'm saddened that we are all so apathetic now and that an angry mob has not gone down too the houses of parliament with pitchforks and torches to call these corrupt incompetent w@nkers to order.
And then you hear of Julian Assange loosing his extradition appeal for some made up crime.
I'm saddened that we are all so apathetic now and that an angry mob has not gone down too the houses of parliament with pitchforks and torches to call these corrupt incompetent w@nkers to order.
Post edited by Scottie_uk on
Calling all ASCII Art Architects Visit the WOS Wall of Text and contribute: https://www.yourworldoftext.com/wos
Comments
Andy Coulson on perjury charges? That might mean that little sweaty sh*te (in my personal opinion, lawyers) that is Tommy Sheridan might get exonerated.
Only difference now is it feels like the 1990s, under labor it was more like the 1890s :lol:
Just ride up and down past parliament on your unicycle to get things started.
You have two women making the claim. The whole point of a trial is to find out if they are legitimate claims. Until the trial happens then it's an unknown and so any suggestion that it's made up is as valid as a suggestion of his guilt.
..hence the need for extradition and a trial. Not sure where tory sleeze comes into that. It's a legitimate legal course of action to find the truth and bring justice for the alleged victims or vindicate him.
It's also a perfect excuse to get rid of him without killing him :D
I have my suspicions he'll be found guilty even if he isn't.
Aye, good job the judicial system isn't run on conspiracy theories and bad feelings though! best to leave it in the hands of the Illuminati.
EDIT: Though to be honest, a CIA bullet in his head would have been a lot easier for them if they wanted rid of him.
In this case I think it'll be run by the highest bidder :D
Also I think the Stonecutters have more pull than the Illuminati ;)
'LONDON - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange lashed out at a British publisher for releasing drafts of a memoir without his approval Thursday, saying he did not author the book or get the opportunity to check it.
British publisher Canongate announced that the book, billed as an "unauthorized autobiography," will go on sale in stores and online Thursday. Sections of the memoir have already appeared on the website of The Independent newspaper in the U.K.
Canongate paid the 40-year-old Assange for the rights to the memoir last year. It said that Assange began working with a ghostwriter on the book, but later backed out and tried to cancel his contract. It said that since he had not repaid his advance, it had decided to publish the first draft that the WikiLeaks founder delivered to the publisher in March.
Assange disputed that account in a statement released exclusively to The Associated Press, accusing the publisher for "profiteering from an unfinished and erroneous draft."
"The events surrounding its unauthorized publication by Canongate are not about freedom of information ? they are about old-fashioned opportunism and duplicity ? screwing people over to make a buck," Assange said in the statement.
The draft, written by Andrew O'Hagan, was a work in progress, and has not been corrected or fact-checked by him, he said.'
Particularly amusing.
a lot of politicians regardless of party have their head in the trout.. sadly it affects those who are doing the job for the right reason and do have to "bend" some of the time..
I'm sure they have some proof of him being in sweden etc etc. they would have some case against him, and that being the case YES he should answer for it. Just because he's doing that wiki thing thats a separate thing. Much like you on ya unicycle, don't mean ya a member of the circus ;-)
only he knows what he did / didn't do.
I can understand the concern with it, and well he isn't exactly media shy is he ? and the from what others who "worked" with him on wikileaks said later seemed rather interesting. what we "know" and what goes on in the background are 2 very different things :) . There is always that debate is it better to hide things from people or not.
the wiki thing, and what he does in his private life are 2 separate things.. much as certain MP's have been "done" for perjury in the past.
Completely agree there are rogue MPs in all the major parties, but the Tories clearly have by far the most.
The most surprising thing is that it was the National Enquirer that discovered it! :lol:
"In 2007, Edwards, who at the time was a leading candidate for president, lied about his mistress and baby when the National Enquirer caught him at the Beverly Hilton Hotel visiting the child. The jury in his conspiracy and illegal campaign contributions trial Thursday found Edwards not guilty on one of six counts. The judge declared a mistrial on the other five counts."
Apparently the prosecution is not going to ask for a retrial on the other six counts...lucky him, he was facing 30yrs I believe.
it was probably a massive suprise to them too when it turned out to be true. :p
They're all as bad as each other, in fact the majority of MPs who went to prison for fraudulent expenses claims were Labour. Don't forget the lovely couple of Ed Balls and Yvette Cooper and their dodgy expenses. Yet those two sit on Labour's front bench, one is shadow chancellor and the other is tipped to replace Ed Miliband as leader before the next election.
You can't single out one party unless you have a partisan axe to grind.