No, I'd just like to see if certain people have the front to talk the way in public that they do online. And then watch them get laughed at if they do.
No, I'd just like to see if certain people have the front to talk the way in public that they do online. And then watch them get laughed at if they do.
Wow... That sounds quite nasty. Who'd you mean exactly?
No, I'd just like to see if certain people have the front to talk the way in public that they do online. And then watch them get laughed at if they do.
I assume it's me he's alluding to. But he won't say, either here or on IRC.
I don't know why he's being so spiteful (either to me or to someone else). At least if somebody annoys me, either on a forum or in real life, I actually have to front to say so instead of making vague childish allusions. It seems quite cowardly.
It's the CSSCGC, the CSSFAQ, and CSS meets for a reason: CSS was around long before WoSf and I suspect it will still be around long after.
Hmmm, dunno about that... but I just spent an enjoyable half an hour in Xnews going through loads of old CSS posts as far back as March 2005. It's strangely sad reading old conversations I had with Lister, even if he did talk a load of old spheroids sometimes :(
Now all I need to do is remember which [strike]pr0n[/strike] music newsgroups I was subscribed to ten years ago...
I assume it's me he's alluding to. But he won't say, either here or on IRC.
I don't know why he's being so spiteful (either to me or to someone else). At least if somebody annoys me, either on a forum or in real life, I actually have to front to say so instead of making vague childish allusions. It seems quite cowardly.
Never assume - you'll just make an ass of you and me. Look at what you're saying, you're accusing a guy of being a coward based upon an assumption that only you have.
This isn't the WoSF I remember. Moderators, time to lock this thread I think, it's getting stupid now.
Never assume - you'll just make an ass of you and me. Look at what you're saying, you're accusing a guy of being a coward based upon an assumption that only you have.
Err... no. No I'm not. He's alluding to someone and won't elaborate, which I said is cowardly. I'm assuming it's me, yes, but if it's not me it's someone else.
Err... no. No I'm not. He's alluding to someone and won't elaborate, which I said is cowardly. I'm assuming it's me, yes, but if it's not me it's someone else.
Countered.
He doesn't HAVE to elaborate though - there are no rules here that says he must.
Consider: You have insulted a member of WoSF - the motivation for doing so is an assumption, which may or may not be correct.
He doesn't HAVE to elaborate though - there are no rules here that says he must.
Yep, I know that. I just said making allusions to "certain people" and refusing to name them is cowardly. I'm not demanding anyone elaborates on anything, am I?
Consider: You have insulted a member of WoSF - the motivation for doing so is an assumption, which may or may not be correct.
Comments
No, I'd just like to see if certain people have the front to talk the way in public that they do online. And then watch them get laughed at if they do.
http://www.worldofspectrum.org/forums/showpost.php?p=729482&postcount=11
WHO, they?
Lets hope its not you, otherwise you might get your ears boxed 8-)
Yeah, but all participants needs to down 12 pints of mild or milk stout before they are allowed to enter.
I don't know why he's being so spiteful (either to me or to someone else). At least if somebody annoys me, either on a forum or in real life, I actually have to front to say so instead of making vague childish allusions. It seems quite cowardly.
The attention seeking Judge said I'm not allowed to do that any more.
Hmmm, dunno about that... but I just spent an enjoyable half an hour in Xnews going through loads of old CSS posts as far back as March 2005. It's strangely sad reading old conversations I had with Lister, even if he did talk a load of old spheroids sometimes :(
Now all I need to do is remember which [strike]pr0n[/strike] music newsgroups I was subscribed to ten years ago...
Never assume - you'll just make an ass of you and me. Look at what you're saying, you're accusing a guy of being a coward based upon an assumption that only you have.
This isn't the WoSF I remember. Moderators, time to lock this thread I think, it's getting stupid now.
Will it resolve or will it be countered?
He doesn't HAVE to elaborate though - there are no rules here that says he must.
Consider: You have insulted a member of WoSF - the motivation for doing so is an assumption, which may or may not be correct.