Who is Andrew Pennell?
According to the What's New page, Andrew Pennell has granted distribution of his software. I was positive that he was a part of HiSoft, yet there's no mention of any of their programs on his Infoseek entry. Is it the same person or is there a different Andrew Pennell working there or have I gotten his name mixed up with someone else?
Necros.
Necros.
Post edited by Ian Hamilton on
Comments
http://blogs.msdn.com/andypennell/
and for the last ten years he has been working on Microsoft C compilers.
He has also been working on an HD DVD player.
And he is the same Andrew Pennell who worked on Hisoft's compilers.
http://blogs.msdn.com/andypennell/search.aspx?q=hisoft&p=1
HiSoft BASIC 2 was my favourite BASIC version on the Atari ST. I still have it actually. I used to spent loads of time writing small programs with it, which I may still have. I used to have fun calling the GEM libraries and seeing what havoc I could create with them. :)
I also had Devpac and even succeeded in learning a (very tiny) amount of 68000 assembly and producing a few pointless programs (which did next to nothing :)).
Necros.
"Written by Cameron Hayne with routines by Andy Pennell"
so it would be nice to add him to the authors. A variation of 'Clive Copier' appeared on the second 'Introduction' microdrive and was very good. I've even used it to copy between an emulator and real microdrive.
One of Andy's suggestions was incorporated into the ROMs of most Interface 1 ROMs.
Necros.
He's a web developer - http://www.peteshaw.com/
There is no doubt that Cameron is the main author and perhaps a little remark could clarify this. Toni Baker is also credited in the manual for the 128K keypad routines.
When, in his blog, Andy says he wrote much of Hisoft BASIC he will be referring to the Atari and Amiga versions.
It is nice that today Andy designs C++ compilers and Cameron teaches C++.
While what you say is true, there's no such option in the Infoseek database. One was either involved, or one wasn't... it would get far too difficult to make distinctions, since in some case, a person "only" did the loading screen, or some "small" part such as the fonts or sound effects. Even simpler, how could I possibly classify the amount of contribution between, say, code, graphics and music (without stepping on too many toes, that is)?
Read the permission slips and all will be revailed :wink:
*slinks off quietly to check the permission slips*
Wouldn't mind a nosey at them myself....
Just go to the Copyright section, scroll down to the Individual permissions and click on the asterix to the right of most names.
There are some great supporters there - Alfred Milgrom, John Lettice, Roger Valentine... One of the many interesting places to browse on WOS.