› ›

Still no Who thread yet?

guesserguesser
edited June 2006 in Chit chat
That trailer didn't give much away about the 2 parter then *COUGH COUGH*

at the end of this weeks episode the Doctor can tell something bads coming, he can hear that Ooooooooeeeeeeeeooooeeeeoooooooo music again, dead givaway ;-)
Post edited by guesser on
My rubbish website including the redrawn Amstrad schematics and the Sinclair Wiki.

Comments

  • Ian HamiltonIan Hamilton
    edited June 2006
    I didn't like the episode at all. It was just a crap rip-off of Paperhouse, complete with angry father/monster and everything. The preview for the finale was brilliant though. I wonder if Rose is going to die. Maybe she will and the Doctor will pull a Superman and cross his own time stream to save her.

    Necros.
  • NickHNickH
    edited June 2006
    I liked it. Rose is getting over-confident and I wouldn't be surprised if that causes her downfall. A bit too much sugar coating on the flame-lighting, but I thought it was a pretty good ep.
  • guesserguesser
    edited June 2006
    after last weeks episode though anything looks good.

    It's like me standing next to an incredibly obese and butt ugly person so I look mildly slim and good looking :grin:
    My rubbish website including the redrawn Amstrad schematics and the Sinclair Wiki.
  • NickHNickH
    edited June 2006
    guesser wrote:
    after last weeks episode though anything looks good.

    It's like me standing next to an incredibly obese and butt ugly person so I look mildly slim and good looking :grin:
    What are you insinuating?







    ;)
  • guesserguesser
    edited June 2006
    fogartylee wrote:
    I didn't set fire to anything!
    :razz:

    Character limit my arse :evil:
    My rubbish website including the redrawn Amstrad schematics and the Sinclair Wiki.
  • Bluce_ReeBluce_Ree
    edited June 2006
    last week's one was so very, very shit that today's seemed inoffensive if a little bit clumsy with all the Olympics cack they threw in.

    that said it really is getting to be X-Files for kids.

    Rose dying/leaving/whatever is a bonus though. Although they'll make out as if she's been some awesome character when she's just been crap throughout.
  • guesserguesser
    edited June 2006
    hopefully they'll make sure she's well and truly dead, and can't come back, ever :evil:

    :wink:
    My rubbish website including the redrawn Amstrad schematics and the Sinclair Wiki.
  • zeropolis79zeropolis79
    edited June 2006
    We loved Rose in this house..

    The teaser for next weeks one looks good - it looks like "Daleks Vs Cybermen!".
  • MattLambMattLamb
    edited June 2006
    I don't watch Doctor Who. I used to watch it when I was a kid, but have never been able to get into these latest series'.

    Perhaps I'm being overly simplistic here, but how can you let anyone die an untimely death or be killed when you have a dirty great time machine at your disposal? It seems mighty careless to me.
  • zeropolis79zeropolis79
    edited June 2006
    "You cannot rewrite history - not one line!"

    The laws of time state that you can't go back and prevent someone from dying - the Doctor refused to save former companion Adric from death after Earthshock.
  • guesserguesser
    edited June 2006
    It woulad create a paradox, In the first of the new serie the Rose's dad story was about this :p
    My rubbish website including the redrawn Amstrad schematics and the Sinclair Wiki.
  • MattLambMattLamb
    edited June 2006
    Well I'm damn sure I'd use my time machine to rewrite history. Just hope, people, that I never get my hands on that power!

    Anyway, if he can't rewrite history, what does he use his time machine for?
  • guesserguesser
    edited June 2006
    In the new series, he seems to be Joyriding imho. The doctor used to go around sorting out problems, now he just happens to stumble across them while holidaying in space and time. Trouble always seems to follow him. :-)
    It's like that Poirot where he goes on holiday to an island to rest, and surprise surprise, someone gets murdered :-P
    My rubbish website including the redrawn Amstrad schematics and the Sinclair Wiki.
  • MattLambMattLamb
    edited June 2006
    Not to mention Murder She Wrote.

    How anyone ever trusted her is beyond me. She turns up somewhere to visit and old friend, and woe and behold that friend gets murdered. Next thing you know she's not only solved the case, but written a best seller based on it!

    Anyway, I digress.
  • guesserguesser
    edited June 2006
    funny how Poirot, Miss Marple, Quincy, Murder She Wrote, Frost, Morse, Diagnosis Murder, etc all have similar murders happen, must be some sort of conspiracy :-)
    My rubbish website including the redrawn Amstrad schematics and the Sinclair Wiki.
  • Lee_dCLee_dC
    edited June 2006
    guesser wrote:
    funny how Poirot, Miss Marple, Quincy, Murder She Wrote, Frost, Morse, Diagnosis Murder, etc all have similar murders happen, must be some sort of conspiracy :-)

    to be fair, some of those characters are actually detectives or police medical examiners and whatnot, so you'd expect them to be getting stuck into a fair few murders ;)
  • guesserguesser
    edited June 2006
    I mean it's the same murder plot each time :-)
    My rubbish website including the redrawn Amstrad schematics and the Sinclair Wiki.
  • Ian HamiltonIan Hamilton
    edited June 2006
    Millennium is the best cop/forensics show, much better than CSI or Law & Order. It's a pity it didn't last longer than it did.

    Necros.
  • MattLambMattLamb
    edited June 2006
    Quincy is the best.

    Forensic science, police investigations, Quince risking his job (every episode), and womanising by the bucket load.

    What more does a show need?
  • rich_chandlerrich_chandler
    edited June 2006
    MattLamb wrote:
    Quince risking his job (every episode), and womanising by the bucket load.
    Sounds like me...
    I wanna tell you a story 'bout a woman I know...
  • ewgfewgf
    edited June 2006
    This week's episode was terrible, extremely boring and pointless - the one positive thing to be said about it is that at least it's not as bad as last week's, which was without question the worst episode of Dr Who I've ever seen (and I've seen every episode since the first Pertwee (3rd Dcotor) episode until today, plus a lot of Patrick Troughton's (2nd Doctor) and some of William Hartnell's (1st Doctor), except for the two Children in Need specials and the Rown Atkinson send-up).
  • zeropolis79zeropolis79
    edited June 2006
    I liked this episode but the teaser was mouthwatering.

    The Time Lords used their TARDIS machines to observe the comings and goings in the universe. The Doctor left in order to do good, the Master and Rani left to do evil. The Meddling Monk (The Time Meddler) left to meddle in history (like helping Harold win the Battle of Hastings by using atomic weapons to wipe out the Vikings). Drax (The Armageddon Factor) left to make money
Sign In or Register to comment.