"People have said that our children are disabled, but that is wrong. They are not disabled," said Patrick.
"Eric, our eldest child, has epilepsy, but he was born two months premature, he also has learning difficulties. Our other daughter, Sarah, has special needs," Patrick said.
"People have said that our children are disabled, but that is wrong. They are not disabled," said Patrick.
"Eric, our eldest child, has epilepsy, but he was born two months premature, he also has learning difficulties. Our other daughter, Sarah, has special needs," Patrick said.
erm? contradiction?
Yeah, I noticed that as well. Hardly the most stormingly well argued defence of their position, is it?
"They're not disabled! Er, except for the two that are disabled, that is".
This is just weird, how very disturbing.
I'm surprised that they are surprised people think they've commited a crime........er they have, and still are.
I'd think their point might be that their children don't have disabilities associated with genetic defects.
There's certainly an increased risk that they might both be carrying a defective gene that could be expressed in their offspring. However, as they say, this is far less likely to be passed on than when someone who has a known genetic disorder has children which is entirely within the law.
Still, anyone who fancies their siblings needs to get out more; a heck of a lot more. :)
the only good thing to come out of it, would be that the ginger kid wouldn't be bullied as much at school as these kids. (not because their disabled, but because their parents are related.)
Ha ha very good. Poor ginger kids at school eh ?! They got a ton of abuse, at our school the other people getting abuse was a scottish kid called Dorian (To everyone back then that was a weird name) and an asian lad (nothing racist) called Dahlin. (pronounced darling). I'm sure he loved the 'alright darling' comments, top bloke though
Comments
not sure about genetics, but wont thier kids all have 11 toes or something.
their own kids.
erm? contradiction?
yeah but your sisters kids are your neices/nephews.
...However, a quick 'Google' found them...
pic 1 http://new.photos.yahoo.com/chaosmongers/photo/294928804266674651/0
pic 2:
http://www.solarnavigator.net/music/music_images/andrew_lloyd_webber_portrait.jpg
Yeah, I noticed that as well. Hardly the most stormingly well argued defence of their position, is it?
"They're not disabled! Er, except for the two that are disabled, that is".
I'm surprised that they are surprised people think they've commited a crime........er they have, and still are.
There's certainly an increased risk that they might both be carrying a defective gene that could be expressed in their offspring. However, as they say, this is far less likely to be passed on than when someone who has a known genetic disorder has children which is entirely within the law.
Still, anyone who fancies their siblings needs to get out more; a heck of a lot more. :)
luckily though, there was a kid with a massive head and an albino lad so they suffered the most.