The Banana - the Atheists' nightmare

edited March 2007 in Chit chat
http://www.godtube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=c5280214e0486b273a5f

I'm still trying to work out whether this is a p*ss take or not. Whatever it is, I just can't stop laughing at it.
Post edited by Daren on

Comments

  • edited March 2007
    lol it's not. I channel surfed through this very scene one night. Utter, utter garbage and there is so much of this sort of crap (miracle cures, what they don't want you to know, i can read your mind, all you have to do is want it and it will come, etc) on late at night. It's probably important to note he was trying to sell something. Ie he's a shyster.
  • edited March 2007
    So god made the banana for us humans then? Well stop letting those bloody monkeys and Orangutans eat them all. They ought to get their own foods. Other smaller monkeys for example.
  • edited March 2007
    I guess this just shows that it's a complete waste of time arguing with creationists.

    Still, there's no harm in pointing out the folly of their ways to others. :-D
  • edited March 2007
    A lot of Christian mentalfundalists are as described in the classic Genesis track "Jesus He Knows Me:"
    God will take good care of you,
    If you do as I say -- don't do as I do.

    :lol:

    There's one such called Andrew Chung who spams the diabetic newsgroups.  (He sets himself up as some kind of latter-day electronic martyr; he seems too dumb to realise that most people who object to his religious spam don't object because it's religious, but because it's spam...)
    I never make misteaks mistrakes misyales errurs — oh, sod it.
  • edited March 2007
    ROTFL! I can't believe it's not piss take! Surely?
  • edited March 2007
    And on the 6th day after creating various forms of round fruit God said unto himself "Today I shall create a fruit that reminds me of a penis, it shall be yellow in colour and it's skin shall be used for making people slip and fall on their bottoms. And I shall call this fruit a bernana". And Gods little helper said "Your a bit mental you, what if there are so many of these bernanas that everyone slips over all the time" to which God replied "Ha I've already thought of that you biff, right before teabreak I created both monkeys, weetabix and gave humans the knowledge to make a bernana sandwich. Now go make me a cup of tea FOOL!!!".

    And it's all true because it's in the bible.
  • edited March 2007
    LOL. I've been banned from godtube. All I did was add the comment to the video "WTF is a bannana?"

    Here's another hilarious video from the site I found, before being kicked off:

    http://www.godtube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=e9edb98dd85606f2c119
  • edited March 2007
    ......but the fellatio dream
  • edited March 2007
    aowen wrote: »
    I have one word for people who believe in god -- entropy.

    Heh heh. That doesn't explain the big bang -- a whole lotta something out of a perfectly uniform nothing.
  • edited March 2007
    aowen wrote: »
    Nothing cannot, by its very nature, be uniform, since it is an absence of anything.

    I'm happy to let the big bang stand as a paradox. There's nothing about it that implies a creator, and entropy affects everything that comes after it, to the point where life itself will eventually be impossible because there won't be enough order left in the universe to sustain it.

    I'm not happy to let something as important as that stand as a paradox. Years ago at college it was the first question I asked to geeks who usually were fervent atheists. What happened before the big bang? Nobody could give me an answer, because nobody knows. Maybe there is a god, maybe there isn't, but if you're being honest, with a question as important as the big bang unanswered, we can't really say one way or another what's going on.
    THE RETRO GAMER IRC CHATROOM. EVERY SUNDAY AT 9PM BST. LOG ON USING THE LINK BELOW:
    https://discordapp.com/invite/cZt59EQ
  • edited March 2007
    Daren wrote: »
    http://www.godtube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=c5280214e0486b273a5f

    I'm still trying to work out whether this is a p*ss take or not. Whatever it is, I just can't stop laughing at it.

    A banana is also a really bad example, seeing as it's been selectively bred by man over hundreds of years to be large and seedless. Hell, the plant can't even reproduce - each banana tree is a clone of another, created by man...
    (That's why there is a big panic right now about the banana tree virus in Jamaica... It was sad, I was over there in February and all the trees were dying of a virus... so little genetic diversity in the trees made them easy targets).

    Andrew
  • 48K48K
    edited March 2007
    A banana is also a really bad example, seeing as it's been selectively bred by man over hundreds of years to be large and seedless. Hell, the plant can't even reproduce - each banana tree is a clone of another, created by man...
    (That's why there is a big panic right now about the banana tree virus in Jamaica... It was sad, I was over there in February and all the trees were dying of a virus... so little genetic diversity in the trees made them easy targets).

    Andrew

    But Andrew, this just PROVES that God created the banana: It's not even allowed to evolve by natural selection! :D


    ---
    On a serious note - it is sad example of what selective inbreeding can cause. Aside from the Royal family of course.
  • edited March 2007
    That banana video has only increased my belief that we are descended from the apes.
  • edited March 2007
    Daren wrote: »
    That banana video has only increased my belief that we are descended from the apes.

    that true, that's why we can roller skate, host tea parties, and make lighthearted jokes when moving piano's
  • edited March 2007
    Can I recommend a good book on the subject?

    The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins.

    A very well respected science writer's take on the whole God debate.

    I'm actually a bit surprised this thread has been allowed to go on for so long, considering that the chit-chat forum guidelines state:

    C) Discussions of religions or religious philosophies, cultural differences, sex, sexual orientation, freedom of speech, politics and governments tend to end in flame wars and trading insults. Please remember that the majority of these discussions end up being locked.

    Ho hum.
  • edited March 2007
    BigBadMick wrote: »
    Can I recommend a good book on the subject?

    The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins.

    A very well respected science writer's take on the whole God debate.

    the bible pretty much wraps everything up. tells you how the universe was created and everything. you can purchase it in most good churches. there are a couple of spin offs, the thorah and the koran, but these are a bit more fantasy based according to the pope.
  • edited March 2007
    BigBadMick wrote: »
    Can I recommend a good book on the subject?

    The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins.

    A very well respected science writer's take on the whole God debate.

    I'm actually a bit surprised this thread has been allowed to go on for so long, considering that the chit-chat forum guidelines state:

    C) Discussions of religions or religious philosophies, cultural differences, sex, sexual orientation, freedom of speech, politics and governments tend to end in flame wars and trading insults. Please remember that the majority of these discussions end up being locked.

    Ho hum.

    Yeah it's true. The funny thing about guys like Dawkins and other fanatics is that if they don't believe in a personal God, why do they talk about God in such a personally bitter way? He's giving Atheism a bad name.

    As Albert Einstein said- "there are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is of the same kind as the intolerance of the religious fanatics and comes from the same source." Well said, Albert.
    THE RETRO GAMER IRC CHATROOM. EVERY SUNDAY AT 9PM BST. LOG ON USING THE LINK BELOW:
    https://discordapp.com/invite/cZt59EQ
  • edited March 2007
    speaking from a point somewhere between an agnostic and an atheist (this fence is giving me splinters) i am of the view that god, if one exists, is going to be well beyond the point of my understanding, so it's pointless trying. I'll just do my own thing and hope everything turns out alright in the end.

    There are some wonderful quotes from Douglas Adams which, while they do not help in my understanding one jot, make me laugh, and I'll content myself with that.

    "In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move."

    "He hoped and prayed that there wasn't an afterlife. Then he realized there was a contradiction involved here and merely hoped that there wasn't an afterlife."
  • edited March 2007
    BigBadMick wrote: »
    Can I recommend a good book on the subject?

    The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins.

    What an interesting co-incidence. Just today someone got this very book to office.
  • edited March 2007
    The origins of the universe is quite probably a problem science will never solve; it may be something stuck in philosophy forever. It's also important to keep in mind that we are still relatively primitive in our understanding of the universe - there is much we don't yet understand. Although the "end of science" has been forecasted since the 1800s there has always been something new that has been found to demonstrate how primitive (and incomplete) our understanding was. And now with some scientists predicting the "end of science" with a theory that unifies all known forces (though less fervently than was done 20 years ago), it's important to know that having a "theory of everything" is not the same as understanding what it means.

    Anyway the only truly defendable position is agnosticism, all the rest is faith. The nutjob religious crowd and the nutjob atheist crowd should be ignored, the rest are able to live together. The nutjob religious must learn that what science endeavours to uncover is truths about the universe and attempting to obfuscate or mislead its findings only makes one look stupid to the educated and will ultimately discredit one to all in the future. The nutjob atheists need to reflect on how little they really know about the universe and understand that what they really hold is an opinion, one that can live side by side with alternative moderate opinions.

    Anyway I always find it helpful to remember that many people smarter than you or I who have been and are prominent scientists are religious. Science does not equal atheism.
  • edited March 2007
    aowen wrote: »
    Being an atheist doesn't mean I am utterly convinced that there is no god, just that on the balance of probabilities I find it unlikely and would need to see some hard evidence to be convinced otherwise.

    No; that's agnosticism, not atheism.  An agnostic is not convinced as to whether or not there's one or more gods (a-gnostic==no religion); an atheist is firmly convinced that there are no gods (a-theist==no god).
    I never make misteaks mistrakes misyales errurs — oh, sod it.
  • edited March 2007
    You know, Darth Vader found having a lack of faith disturbing :lol:

    And wasn't the "Big Bang" a porno film.

    I know we'll ask the frap master himself Mel the Bell ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.