› ›

Another great 25th anniversary this year...

DarenDaren
edited April 2007 in Chit chat
Bladerunner, the iconic SF movie, will see a "Final Cut" version released in it's 25th anniversary year.

It will screen in the cinemas too, which is great, as I've always wanted to see this movie on the big screen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_Runner
Post edited by Daren on

Comments

  • milemile
    edited April 2007
    Daren wrote: »
    Bladerunner, the iconic SF movie, will see a "Final Cut" version released in it's 25th anniversary year.

    It will screen in the cinemas too, which is great, as I've always wanted to see this movie on the big screen.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_Runner

    liking the cinema release, think it might be a bit of a money spinner (get it) the DVD thing, i mean how many more versions can there be.
  • beanzbeanz
    edited April 2007
    I always prefered the narrated version than the non-narrated one.

    Which one is the narrated version so I can downl....err buy it.?
  • milemile
    edited April 2007
    beanz wrote: »
    I always prefered the narrated version than the non-narrated one.

    Which one is the narrated version so I can downl....err buy it.?

    the narated one is the original, the un narated one is the directors cut. (there are also some differences in the scenes too.)
  • VanTammenVanTammen
    edited April 2007
    same with me, i think the narrated version is much more interesting than the Directors cut...

    it gave a some depth and 40's film noir envoirment to all of it...



    actually in 80% of the times I think directors cut are worst that the original release...
  • DarenDaren
    edited April 2007
    I preferred the director's cut, with it's non-happy ending and the "is Deckard a replicant?" element, not present in the original.
  • beanzbeanz
    edited April 2007
    The Deckard being a replicant thing never sat well with me.....if he was he would not have got his ass kicked around by the other replicants so easily.
  • DarenDaren
    edited April 2007
    Rachel was an experimental replicant. "More human than human is our motto - Rachel is nothing more than an experiment" mentions Tyrell.

    As well as memory implants, giving these "experiments" the same strengths as humans, unlike the super-strength Nexus 6 models, would be a big step to making them more human. Deckard could have been such a replcant.
  • beanzbeanz
    edited April 2007
    Daren wrote: »
    Rachel was an experimental replicant. "More human than human is our motto - Rachel is nothing more than an experiment" mentions Tyrell.

    As well as memory implants, giving these "experiments" the same strengths as humans, unlike the super-strength Nexus 6 models, would be a big step to making them more human. Deckard could have been such a replcant.

    I stand (sit) corrected.
Sign In or Register to comment.