Tiscali now famous around the world...

edited April 2008 in Chit chat
...as the ISP that tried to get (private, non-Tiscali customers) website owners to subsidise their company.

They say there's no such thing as bad publicity, and we're seeing a test case in progress.
Post edited by NickH on

Comments

  • edited April 2008
    Is this the flap about the BBC iPlayer?

    The ironic thing is, is how all the broadband services heavily promoted how you could now get things like video by switching to broadband.

    Then as soon as the subscribers do just that, they all start bleating! I can't say I have any sympathy for them. They made the bed that they now lie in.
  • edited April 2008
    Winston wrote: »
    Is this the flap about the BBC iPlayer?

    The ironic thing is, is how all the broadband services heavily promoted how you could now get things like video by switching to broadband.

    Then as soon as the subscribers do just that, they all start bleating! I can't say I have any sympathy for them. They made the bed that they now lie in.

    I agree completely. Shame on Tiscali.
  • edited April 2008
    Winston wrote: »
    They made the bed that they now lie in.

    Not only that but they micturated in it too.
  • edited April 2008
    Have you got a link Nick?
    I wanna tell you a story 'bout a woman I know...
  • edited April 2008
    It's ok I found one.

    Good. ISP's have been offering a service that they can't actually give you for far too long. When was the last time you actually had a 4mb, 8mb or 2mb connection?
    I wanna tell you a story 'bout a woman I know...
  • edited April 2008
    karingal wrote: »
    It's ok I found one.

    Good. ISP's have been offering a service that they can't actually give you for far too long. When was the last time you actually had a 4mb, 8mb or 2mb connection?

    Good point, sick and tired of hearing how i can get 8mb speed when i just cant because of the area i live in.

    I must admit though i'm still happy as anything with 5 mb as i'm so used to the old days of 512k or before that a 56k modem ;)
  • edited April 2008
    psj3809 wrote: »
    Good point, sick and tired of hearing how i can get 8mb speed when i just cant because of the area i live in.

    I must admit though i'm still happy as anything with 5 mb as i'm so used to the old days of 512k or before that a 56k modem ;)
    Ah yes, I remember the days. I had a free connection for up to an hour at a time and the only time I could tie up the telephone line for an hour was between 11pm and 12am so I was on the internet for just a hour a day. Dunno what I did for the other 23 hours...
    I wanna tell you a story 'bout a woman I know...
  • edited April 2008
    Yeah i lived at home in those days, my folks hated me going online blocking the phoneline the second it turned 6pm.

    Still remember the first time i went online, was cool, used to be 'normal' to sit there waiting patiently for a website or photo to slowlyyyy build its way down. Of course my mates came round my house to get me to type rude words into search engines !

    The first time i layed Quake II online, ahhhh good times !

    I only got wireless a few years ago, that was again amazing having two computers on the net at the same time ! Plus of course the phoneline isnt blocked. Recently bought one of those wireless extenders so the rooms in my house where the signal was dodgy i can get a perfect signal now. Technology is so good !
  • edited April 2008
    People, people! There is absolutely nothing wrong with using a 56k connection ... aside from tying up the phoneline ... and the slow sites ... and not using Flash ... or Java heavy sites (Runescape :-( ) ... but at least I ... err ... I mean 56k users keep their Inet usage to a bare minimum, such as rarely checking e-mail and occasionally visiting WoS.
    psj3809 wrote: »
    The first time i layed Quake II online, ahhhh good times !

    Was it a good lay? :grin: :-P
  • edited April 2008
    ZnorXman wrote: »



    Was it a good lay? :grin: :-P

    the first one is always the best. ;)
  • edited April 2008
    ZnorXman wrote: »
    People, people! There is absolutely nothing wrong with using a 56k connection ... aside from tying up the phoneline ... and the slow sites ... and not using Flash ... or Java heavy sites (Runescape :-( ) ... but at least I ... err ... I mean 56k users keep their Inet usage to a bare minimum, such as rarely checking e-mail and occasionally visiting WoS.

    True, we shouldnt take the piss out of the scottish who are still on 56k
  • edited April 2008
    psj3809 wrote: »
    True, we shouldnt take the piss out of the scottish who are still on 56k
    or the scandinavian-americans...
    I wanna tell you a story 'bout a woman I know...
  • edited April 2008
    phoo, I couldn't go back to dialup, sure you can get away with it as in just scrape by with kind of an internet connection, but for actually experiencing the web it's terrible. Now that just about every website has Flash ads enbedded rather than the old gifs I can imagine how slow it would be just to log into Yahoo Mail even.

    I remember when Chaosmongers put a Youtube vid up of GameX, and I was still on dialup, took over an hour to stream in a 2 - 3 minute clip, horrible horrible horrible.
  • edited April 2008
    Flashblock for Firefox is great. It makes the web a much less blinky obnoxious place. (It puts a 'play' icon over the flash it blocked, so if it's flash you want to use like YouTube you just press play)
  • edited April 2008
    NickH wrote: »
    ...as the ISP that tried to get (private, non-Tiscali customers) website owners to subsidise their company.

    They say there's no such thing as bad publicity, and we're seeing a test case in progress.

    oh god, what have they done this time?

    /me waits for internet to explode again
  • guesserguesser
    finds article HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA now they're fucked, finally the general public comprising the v...
    edited April 2008
    /me finds article

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    now they're fucked, finally the general public comprising the vast majority of their customers have found a heavy net usage application, I'd like to see them push this one under the carpet, while they were alienating the odd power user they got away with it

    maybe they should invest in a new infrastructure rather than just selling a few hundred megs of bandwidth to thousands of customers
  • edited April 2008
    The first time I got online, I had to get up 3 hours before I went to bed.

    Then I dialed a number, a specific number for a a bulletin board, which was only operational at certain times. Then wait for a carrier tone. Then hang up. Then dial the number again, then put the reciever into the modem.

    :)
  • edited April 2008
    Sorry, no idea what you are talking about. Article link please :)

    BTW look at all the (un)happy pipex customers these days.
  • edited April 2008
    The great thing about Tiscali's bleatings is that BT said, "it's not really a big deal at all, it'll be taken in the stride of our normal backhaul upgrades". Very unusual for the dominant, mostly monopoly provider to shrug it off and the 'competitive' carrier bleating!
  • edited April 2008
    psj3809 wrote: »
    True, we shouldnt take the piss out of the scottish who are still on 56k

    Oi! I'll have you know our 56k was brilliant. End of argument :-P

    Until we moved and had to get BT's 24/7 shite. Yeah we could go on anytime we wanted but we were limited to 5 hours a day. Going from unlimited 56k Telewest with no outages to BT's 24/7 pisstake was annoying.

    We manage to get 8mb on Virgin broadband regularly here. But between 4pm and 9pm we limit it because of that stupid bloody traffic mismanagement crap.

    Still, the rest of the time it's fabulous!
    Oh, no. Every time you turn up something monumental and terrible happens.
    I don’t think I have the stomach for it.
    --Raziel (Legend of Kain: Soul Reaver 2)

    https://www.youtube.com/user/VincentTSFP
  • edited April 2008
    thx1138 wrote: »
    The first time I got online, I had to get up 3 hours before I went to bed.

    Then I dialed a number, a specific number for a a bulletin board, which was only operational at certain times. Then wait for a carrier tone. Then hang up. Then dial the number again, then put the reciever into the modem.

    :)
    Let's play Global Thermonuclear War.

    The first month I got dialup I was putting up with 24K/s due to a noisy line (call BT to get them to increase the gain, remember that?) and my first monthly bill was over £250 :)

    Now have 8M/s for £14.99/m from an ISP that has never had capacity problems, got wireless and had 1 PC, 1 laptop, 1 Wii and 2 DSs attached to it at the same time with no lag.

    Technology is great. Crappy service providers who sell more than their infrastructure can handle can suck my balls.

    Oh and fair usage rules (with no explicitly stated maximum limit) can fuck right off.
Sign In or Register to comment.