mile wrote: » i voted for 3, it seems like a good number.
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!btnet-peer1!btnet-peer0!btnet!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!thespian.demon.co.uk!starglider From: The Starglider <stargli...@thespian.d.c.u> Newsgroups: comp.sys.sinclair Subject: Re: Test Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:57:50 +0000 Message-ID: <gYcIecKe38Z8Ewle@thespian.d.c.u> References: <MPG.16d0acf3e5640b2b989680@News.CIS.DFN.DE> NNTP-Posting-Host: thespian.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: thespian.demon.co.uk:194.222.59.42 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1013435893 nnrp-13:26778 NO-IDENT thespian.demon.co.uk:194.222.59.42 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Turnpike/6.00-S (<sDVZQUbJmLqvVRZk3WhtibNXIa>) Lines: 24 In message <MPG.16d0acf3e5640b2b989...@News.CIS.DFN.DE>, Dave the Lurker <d...@webshed.org> writes >Please ignore WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! I hate you! <Sob> -- ****************The Starglider***************** Change d.c.u to * Web site:http://www.starglider.co.uk * demon.co.uk * ADE VS. THE SPACESHIP: AN ONGOING SAGA! * TO REPLY. * AT:www.starglider.co.uk * _WW_ * "FANTASTIC! MARVELLOUS!" - David Darling * /_ _\ *********************************************** | O O | ___________________________________________________________oOO_\/_OOo__________
jp wrote: » The Starglider should have posted by now... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!btnet-peer1!btnet-peer0!btnet!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!thespian.demon.co.uk!starglider From: The Starglider <stargli...@thespian.d.c.u> Newsgroups: comp.sys.sinclair Subject: Re: Test Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:57:50 +0000 Message-ID: <gYcIecKe38Z8Ewle@thespian.d.c.u> References: <MPG.16d0acf3e5640b2b989680@News.CIS.DFN.DE> NNTP-Posting-Host: thespian.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: thespian.demon.co.uk:194.222.59.42 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1013435893 nnrp-13:26778 NO-IDENT thespian.demon.co.uk:194.222.59.42 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Turnpike/6.00-S (<sDVZQUbJmLqvVRZk3WhtibNXIa>) Lines: 24 In message <MPG.16d0acf3e5640b2b989...@News.CIS.DFN.DE>, Dave the Lurker <d...@webshed.org> writes >Please ignore WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! WANKER! I hate you! <Sob> -- ****************The Starglider***************** Change d.c.u to * Web site:http://www.starglider.co.uk * demon.co.uk * ADE VS. THE SPACESHIP: AN ONGOING SAGA! * TO REPLY. * AT:www.starglider.co.uk * _WW_ * "FANTASTIC! MARVELLOUS!" - David Darling * /_ _\ *********************************************** | O O | ___________________________________________________________oOO_\/_OOo__________
Graz wrote: » What am I meant to ignore? Hope I havent spoiled anything by inadvertently, not ignoring it. :S PS: I voted 1.
Daren wrote: » Please still ignore this. Ta.
Scottie_uk wrote: » Is this some sort of psycological study? It seems that most people gravitate towards 3 even me.
mile wrote: » im on a three internet modem. good things come in 3's i have 3 testicles its all connected!!!!!!!!!!!
mile wrote: » i have 3 testicles there were 3 wise men. its all connected!!!!!!!!!!!
Comments
56 seemed like a good number.....but swapping them round to make 65 seemed better in the end :p
Necros.
Consider test failed and ignored.
:smile:
69 is a better one.... :wink:
Yup! All of the above!
You fucking bastard!
(Oops!)
PS: I voted 1.
You voted 1? Really, dude! That's like totally the number I voted for!
Oh, I also voted for the other numbers because I didn't want that "1" to feel lonely.
For how long though? Man, the suspense! It's Xmas 1984 all over again!!!
This sh*ts crackin' !
P.S. how come no A, or H or I etc, you cheap b*starrd ;-)
(I'm ignoring this thread and replying to it)
It seems that most people gravitate towards 3 even me.
im on a three internet modem.
good things come in 3's
i have 3 testicles
there were 3 wise men.
its all connected!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm a 4 man myself...
Who'd ya knick ya bolock off?
What? You have guys hanging off of yer ballsies?
*in my head