Nah, I think Mile knows how to use a computer enough to get at porn on it.
I tend to find that the worse someone is at using a computer the more porn there is on it.
porn popups and desktop icons that keep installing themself :p
I tend to find that the worse someone is at using a computer the more porn there is on it.
porn popups and desktop icons that keep installing themself :p
Yeah, little Milesy's computer practically runs itself by now, it's nearing self-awareness.
Thanks for the illuminating reply. The word "Boyo" at the end is a massive clue. Sorry for enquiring why you don't write for a magazine I enjoy any more, stupid me and my curiosity. Sounds like a subject you don't want to mention, but do, because it's in your sig. Weird. Now I'm illuminated and confused.
The question asked on this forum (now my sig) brought a smile to my face, and at the end of the day, why does anyone care what I'm doing with my time? Other than my girlfriend with whom I have a daughter, of course.
I'm glad to hear that you are enjoying Retro Gamer. This is probably because I'm not writing for it, right? But this is the wrong place to be asking the question, as I know RG has its own forums. If people were interested in why I'm not writing for RG, questions would surely be asked there... and none were, so I figured that no one was all that bothered.
And why does it matter that I stopped doing 'stuff' for Retro Gamer?
Regards,
Shaun.
If you dont want to get asked questions about retro gamer then dont have that signature ! I've seen it a few times and havent asked but while we're on the subject i'm also interested !
No one would bother asking if you didnt have that quote in your signature.
The question asked on this forum (now my sig) brought a smile to my face, and at the end of the day, why does anyone care what I'm doing with my time? Other than my girlfriend with whom I have a daughter, of course.
I'm glad to hear that you are enjoying Retro Gamer. This is probably because I'm not writing for it, right? But this is the wrong place to be asking the question, as I know RG has its own forums. If people were interested in why I'm not writing for RG, questions would surely be asked there... and none were, so I figured that no one was all that bothered.
I'm glad I've cleared it up ;-)
Regards,
Shaun.
You seem to think I have something personal against you with your suggestion that I enjoy reading Retro Gamer more becase you don't write for it. Very very strange or maybe your ego can't handle that I asked a question you don't wish to answer? I saw your name, remembered it from Retrogamer, saw your sig and asked a question. Your answers seem to get more and more bizzare. Why is this the wrong place to ask you a question? Are you suggesting if I have a question I have to scour the internet looking for an appropriate forum, then hope you are a member, join it then ask the question?
If you dont want to get asked questions about retro gamer then dont have that signature ! I've seen it a few times and havent asked but while we're on the subject i'm also interested !
No one would bother asking if you didnt have that quote in your signature.
Agreed ... I've seen it enough times by now and have been tempted to ask about the sig ... but at the end of the day I'm all about falling soundly asleep on my feather-down pillow, and not wondering about Mr. Bebbington's sig ... which right about now I have become more curious about ... though not really ... I've got a cold, and might be developing something seriously mucousy for one and all to enjoy.
If you dont want to get asked questions about retro gamer then dont have that signature ! I've seen it a few times and havent asked but while we're on the subject i'm also interested !
No one would bother asking if you didnt have that quote in your signature.
Okay, the joke is no longer funny I guess, so I'll change it.
You seem to think I have something personal against you with your suggestion that I enjoy reading Retro Gamer more becase you don't write for it. Very very strange or maybe your ego can't handle that I asked a question you don't wish to answer? I saw your name, remembered it from Retrogamer, saw your sig and asked a question. Your answers seem to get more and more bizzare. Why is this the wrong place to ask you a question? Are you suggesting if I have a question I have to scour the internet looking for an appropriate forum, then hope you are a member, join it then ask the question?
No, I don't think that you have something personal against me at all. And if you did, I wouldn't care unless you were threatening me or my family in person.
Retro Gamer showed up many of my flaws first time around: about the only thing that I submitted whilst working in house on the magazine that wasn't edited (other than the Turrican feature, which I thought was poor myself), was the 'home-brew' news and reviews.
To clear things up, I thought that it wasn't very progressive for me as a writer and for Retro Gamer as a magazine to continue writing the 'home-brew' news and reviews, especially as at the time I had to review one PC Remake (which I'd just make up, including the scores), and write one emulator guide. The problem with the latter was that I had to write something like 8 or 10 steps to using the emulator. Fine, if it's something like Real Spectrum, but an 8 step guide to using an Atari 2600 emulator? I mean, 'drag and drop' isn't too difficult a concept to get across... devoting a whole page to it was like pulling teeth.
Therefore Retro Gamer has improved because I'm no longer writing for it; because I'm not a good enough writer in more general areas of 'retro', like nostalgia, old games and consoles (three pretty important topics for a magazine called 'Retro Gamer' I think), and because if I was doing what I am fairly good at for RG, reviewing new games on old 8-bit computers, then 100% of the reviews of such products in the printed press will be coming from just one person, as I also review these pieces of entertainment software for Micro Mart. At least now people are able to cross reference any new game they might be interested in, for instance, splATTR, should they want to.
Comments
I tend to find that the worse someone is at using a computer the more porn there is on it.
porn popups and desktop icons that keep installing themself :p
Yeah, little Milesy's computer practically runs itself by now, it's nearing self-awareness.
Bloody hell.
There is actually a channel dedicated to ropey busty girls jiggling about for several hours.
I may never sleep again.
its pretty much like that now.
'please run anti virus scan'
'please restart me'
feck off, your not the boss of me.
That wouldn't be Babestation would it? I've heard about it somewhere................
It's the catchily titled "SmileTV2", although it looks syndicated.
I'm glad to hear that you are enjoying Retro Gamer. This is probably because I'm not writing for it, right? But this is the wrong place to be asking the question, as I know RG has its own forums. If people were interested in why I'm not writing for RG, questions would surely be asked there... and none were, so I figured that no one was all that bothered.
I'm glad I've cleared it up ;-)
Regards,
Shaun.
If you dont want to get asked questions about retro gamer then dont have that signature ! I've seen it a few times and havent asked but while we're on the subject i'm also interested !
No one would bother asking if you didnt have that quote in your signature.
You seem to think I have something personal against you with your suggestion that I enjoy reading Retro Gamer more becase you don't write for it. Very very strange or maybe your ego can't handle that I asked a question you don't wish to answer? I saw your name, remembered it from Retrogamer, saw your sig and asked a question. Your answers seem to get more and more bizzare. Why is this the wrong place to ask you a question? Are you suggesting if I have a question I have to scour the internet looking for an appropriate forum, then hope you are a member, join it then ask the question?
Agreed ... I've seen it enough times by now and have been tempted to ask about the sig ... but at the end of the day I'm all about falling soundly asleep on my feather-down pillow, and not wondering about Mr. Bebbington's sig ... which right about now I have become more curious about ... though not really ... I've got a cold, and might be developing something seriously mucousy for one and all to enjoy.
Regards,
Shaun.
Retro Gamer showed up many of my flaws first time around: about the only thing that I submitted whilst working in house on the magazine that wasn't edited (other than the Turrican feature, which I thought was poor myself), was the 'home-brew' news and reviews.
To clear things up, I thought that it wasn't very progressive for me as a writer and for Retro Gamer as a magazine to continue writing the 'home-brew' news and reviews, especially as at the time I had to review one PC Remake (which I'd just make up, including the scores), and write one emulator guide. The problem with the latter was that I had to write something like 8 or 10 steps to using the emulator. Fine, if it's something like Real Spectrum, but an 8 step guide to using an Atari 2600 emulator? I mean, 'drag and drop' isn't too difficult a concept to get across... devoting a whole page to it was like pulling teeth.
Therefore Retro Gamer has improved because I'm no longer writing for it; because I'm not a good enough writer in more general areas of 'retro', like nostalgia, old games and consoles (three pretty important topics for a magazine called 'Retro Gamer' I think), and because if I was doing what I am fairly good at for RG, reviewing new games on old 8-bit computers, then 100% of the reviews of such products in the printed press will be coming from just one person, as I also review these pieces of entertainment software for Micro Mart. At least now people are able to cross reference any new game they might be interested in, for instance, splATTR, should they want to.
Regards,
Shaun.