US Elections: It's going to be McCain/Palin, isn't it?

14567810»

Comments

  • edited November 2008
    beanz wrote: »
    I agree entirely with this statement!!! :lol:

    I meant those who voted for her :D
    Every night is curry night!
  • edited November 2008
    mile wrote: »
    when this 'news crew' took obama's policies and went on the street asking whites why they were voting for mcain and quoted obamas policies to them. did they agree with the policies?


    No 100% said 'Excuse me, but those are NOT John McCain's policies!, they sound like the policies of a raving lunatic!'
  • edited November 2008
    aowen wrote: »
    Or to turn it on its head, why should it be legal for states to legislate against sexual practice among consenting adults? There are plenty of heterosexual acts that are still illegal in several states you know.

    I feel like such a ribald now ... I am a rebel without a clue.
  • edited November 2008
    ZnorXman wrote: »
    I feel like such a ribald now ... I am a rebel without a clue.

    SODOMY....
  • edited November 2008
    mile wrote: »
    SODOMY....

    Yeah, thanks for the advert, Tinkerbell!
  • edited November 2008
    beanz wrote: »
    Which pretty much sums up the whole campaign....personal attacks rather than attacking her policies.....because they couldn't!

    Well, assuming you're talking about the obama campaign doing the attacking (which is a little confusing, because most of the attacks I saw - of the "Obama is a dangerous socialist muslim terrorist that we know nothing about" variety - came from the Republicans), then it's rather difficult to attack the policies of someone whose political repertoir seems to mainly consist of winking at the camera and saying "You betcha!".

    Still, that's just my worthless opinion ;)

    Hehe

    Andrew
  • edited November 2008
    Incidentally, if you've ever had anal sex or oral sex (both are defined as "sodomy" under the US INA), you are not elegible to travel to the United States under the visa waiver program because you have committed "moral turpitude" as defined by immigration law.
  • edited November 2008
    Winston wrote: »
    Incidentally, if you've ever had anal sex or oral sex (both are defined as "sodomy" under the US INA), you are not elegible to travel to the United States under the visa waiver program because you have committed "moral turpitude" as defined by immigration law.

    Does it still count if youve done it on yourself ?
  • edited November 2008
    Suddenly, it may be cool to be an American again.

    I sure hope so - it's annoying to be embarrassed and ashamed about where you were born in.
  • edited November 2008
    Blimey.

    There's computer graphics, and then there's computer graphics...

    hologram1.jpg

    hologram2.jpg

    hologram3.jpg
  • edited November 2008
    NickH wrote: »
    Suddenly, it may be cool to be an American again.

    I sure hope so - it's annoying to be embarrassed and ashamed about where you were born in.

    Lets leave the Welsh out of this...
  • edited November 2008
    An amusing note about the Illinois lottery yesterday....

    Evening Pick 3 Winning Numbers:
    Wed, Nov 5 2008 is 6-6-6

    :lol:
  • edited November 2008
    aowen wrote: »
    I've found being born in Wales rather helpful when travelling to countries where the English are not well thought of (and there are plenty of them).

    Being English has been uncool for years, that's why. Largely due to the enormous persecution complex harboured by the Scots and Welsh. Although the Scots and the Welsh to be honest have a right to feel a bit persecuted, after all the English did tend to chop the heads off their leadership from time to time.
  • edited November 2008
    Winston wrote: »
    Being English has been uncool for years, that's why. Largely due to the enormous persecution complex harboured by the Scots and Welsh. Although the Scots and the Welsh to be honest have a right to feel a bit persecuted, after all the English did tend to chop the heads off their leadership from time to time.

    Is that worse than sheep shaggin??
  • edited November 2008
  • edited November 2008
    Talking about Palin... did you know John Cleese's opinion on her?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WR3eUjD6y6o
  • edited November 2008
    beanz wrote: »
    Is that worse than sheep shaggin??

    I would say that chopping bits off people is probably worse than sheep shagging!
  • edited November 2008
    Winston wrote: »
    I would say that chopping bits off people is probably worse than sheep shagging!

    i don't know!

    id rather cut someones head off than shag a sheep.
  • edited January 2009
    Back in the Day:




    and then 8 years later:



    Let's hope that whatever the changes 2009 present to us, they will be favourable to one and all.
Sign In or Register to comment.