Waters of Mars

edited November 2009 in Chit chat
If tonights story doesn't recount the birth of the Ice Warriors, then I'm gonna be angry.

PS: Is this years 4 part series just a set of Who films, or is it season 31... or a continuation of season 30? It's getting confusing!
Post edited by Graz on
«1

Comments

  • edited November 2009
    Hmmm. Similar flavour to Voyage of the Damned - didn't really go for it, although the storyline was OK. No excitement until the tail end, though. The Doctor becoming a vengeful god might make a good three-parter.
  • edited November 2009
    I thought it was brilliant. Strong story (I've thought for ages they should do a story about something terrible that happens in the future where the Doctor can't intervene), strong performances (especially Lyndsey Duncan), proper creepy monsters, good air of mystery and very strong "character" stuff, especially the end.

    A really strong scene was the bit where the Doctor was walking away from Bowie Base and hearing all the panic and death in his headset and trying to ignore it.
  • edited November 2009
    I quite enjoyed it. I liked the way the Doctor turned at the end, but they should have left it just before he got the "guilt" trip about what he had done. That would have made the wait for the next part alittle more interesting, but, as the teaser for the next episode showed, it looks like he's going back to visit his old companions again (Cathrine Tate was in the trailer). I for one am looking forward to the new Doctor and another fresh start as they seem to be getting a little too cocky with themselves at the moment.

    A good episode though.
  • edited November 2009
    thought I had sky+ it but it's not on there :(
  • edited November 2009
    thx - don't forget it'll be on the iPlayer so you've probably not missed it after all.
  • edited November 2009
    Winston wrote: »
    thx - don't forget it'll be on the iPlayer so you've probably not missed it after all.

    Plus it'll be repeated to buggery on BBC1 and BBC3 no doubt.
  • edited November 2009
    I thought it was a bit rubbish actually.

    A pretty good set and some good acting. I liked the water pouring out of the mouths and sleeves, but it doesn't add up. Where in the body is it all coming from? Why do their mouths look dry and cracked? If they want to get rid of that much water, why don't they just piss themselves? (Austin Powers was just on the other side...) Why do they want Earth and all its water when they seem to have so much they can piss it all over the deck? Why leave out a filter then use the water in the first place? Why not look to see if the other filters are filtering anything out first?

    Then we have the Doctor landing on Mars at just the right time, but not knowing where he is or what day it is. Yet later on he manages to move the Tardis twice exactly how he wants it when it suits the story. And if he's going to save those people, why not just drop them off later in time where they won't be able to muck about with their own immediate history? Thingy could just meet up with her own granddaughter years later. When did "Doctor Who" become "Mister Twat"?

    Still, it was a Russell T Davies episode, and he did manage to get a gay marriage reference in there even on somewhere as remote as the first human settlement on Mars. What a writer.
    Joefish
    - IONIAN-GAMES.com -
  • edited November 2009
    yeah, I watched it on i player in the end, dug the speakers out the cupboard, and put the laptop on a coffee table, t'was okay
  • edited November 2009
    joefish wrote: »
    I thought it was a bit rubbish actually.

    A pretty good set and some good acting. I liked the water pouring out of the mouths and sleeves, but it doesn't add up. Where in the body is it all coming from? Why do their mouths look dry and cracked? If they want to get rid of that much water, why don't they just piss themselves? (Austin Powers was just on the other side...) Why do they want Earth and all its water when they seem to have so much they can piss it all over the deck? Why leave out a filter then use the water in the first place? Why not look to see if the other filters are filtering anything out first?
    Spoiler:
    Then we have the Doctor landing on Mars at just the right time, but not knowing where he is or what day it is. Yet later on he manages to move the Tardis twice exactly how he wants it when it suits the story. And if he's going to save those people, why not just drop them off later in time where they won't be able to muck about with their own immediate history? Thingy could just meet up with her own granddaughter years later. When did "Doctor Who" become "Mister Twat"?

    Still, it was a Russell T Davies episode, and he did manage to get a gay marriage reference in there even on somewhere as remote as the first human settlement on Mars. What a writer.
    Spoiler:
  • edited November 2009
    Well then he can now bugger off and rescue Adric.
  • edited November 2009
    Sod this doctor I'm downloading the 1965 classic with Peter Cushing :lol:

    Then it's onto the 7th Doctor the one nobody but me liked! Yes that's right McCoy! :p

    I'll get around to that numpty from shallow grave and that twat with the boyband haircut eventually.

    I'm only almost 6 years behind now :D
    Every night is curry night!
  • edited November 2009
    I loved it - and looking forward to the return of The Master.
    Gonna be stuck to the couch this Xmas for that episode.

    Did anyone spot the K9 reference? Oh, how I chuckled. Loved the way the Doc turned at the end - Badass!!!

    NOT looking forward to the new Doctor though. Tennant is a LEGEND and he's totally made the role HIS now. The Doctor has been getting younger and younger since the first, and I'm going to find it hard to accept this young whipper-snapper as the last remaining time-lord.

    Well, I suppose time will tell.

    &e7
  • edited November 2009
    NOT looking forward to the new Doctor though. Tennant is a LEGEND and he's totally made the role HIS now.

    They said that about Christopher Ecclestone, and now it's "Christopher who?"
  • edited November 2009
    I thought Sylvester McCoy was good as Doctor Who. Unfortunately some of those stories used some truly awful models and effects that would have looked cheesy in the 60s. They should at least have been able to pull off some of the quality of the Cushing movies in a TV series by then. It's taken this long just to get Cribbins back. Lets have giant Wombles as the next enemy, eh?

    Zagreb - I don't need reminding of points that were over-explained by the over-acting. And no, he didn't know when it was until he was told. He knew when it was supposed to blow up, but he didn't know he'd arrived on exactly that day because he looked all surprised when they told him and immediately tried to scarper.
    Joefish
    - IONIAN-GAMES.com -
  • edited November 2009
    Then it's onto the 7th Doctor the one nobody but me liked! Yes that's right McCoy! :p

    I like McCoy as well. A very underated Dr if you ask me...

    joefish wrote: »
    I thought Sylvester McCoy was good as Doctor Who. Unfortunately some of those stories used some truly awful models and effects that would have looked cheesy in the 60s. They should at least have been able to pull off some of the quality of the Cushing movies in a TV series by then.

    The main problem with the McCoy era Dr Who is that the BBC just lost interest in it and he was let down by some very poor stories and huge budget cuts. Just compare one of his early stories (say, Rememberence of the Darleks) with one of the last ones (Ghost Light/Survival) and see the difference. I feel that McCoy is being made a scapegoat really as I really liked him!
  • edited November 2009
    but they should have left it just before he got the "guilt" trip about what he had done.

    Totally agree about that, the Dr's " i'm king of the world " arrogance at the end would have been a brilliant cliffhanger. Its always made me wonder why the writers don't actually write a Dr who is afraid of dying, i thought at the end that was the way it was going go to go.
    thx1138 wrote: »
    Well then he can now bugger off and rescue Adric.


    Please no no no, don't even think such terrible thoughts :)
  • edited November 2009
    I like McCoy as well. A very underated Dr if you ask me...

    The main problem with the McCoy era Dr Who is that the BBC just lost interest in it and he was let down by some very poor stories and huge budget cuts. Just compare one of his early stories (say, Rememberence of the Darleks) with one of the last ones (Ghost Light/Survival) and see the difference. I feel that McCoy is being made a scapegoat really as I really liked him!

    I seem to remember that during the McCoy era the BBC were basically trying to kill the show off through bad scheduling and executive disinterest. It was moved from its traditional Saturday evening slot at "teatime" (ie around 5pm) to half seven on a weeknight (Thursdays, I seem to recall) and scheduled opposite Coronation Street, one of the most popular shows on television at the time. McCoy was also saddled with some terrible stories in his first season ("Time and the Rani", his first serial, is still notorious for its badness). It didn't help that McCoy wasn't the best actor and played the Doctor as a "comical" clownish figure for the 1987 season. Things improved later on, though. McCoy started playing the Doctor as rather more serious and, importantly, as a manipulative and even malicious character (Tennant's tenth Doctor in his darker moments owes a lot to McCoy's seventh in this regard) and he had some good stories. Despite what you say "Remembrance..." is a great dalek story (and the first with "proper" weapons effects for the evil pepperpots) and "Ghost Light" (which I re-watched recently having not seen it since 1988 ) is a terrific, if rather complex, story and a great example of what can be done with a limited budget and a lot of imagination.
  • edited November 2009
    Zagreb wrote: »
    Despite what you say "Remembrance..." is a great dalek story (and the first with "proper" weapons effects for the evil pepperpots) and "Ghost Light" (which I re-watched recently having not seen it since 1988 ) is a terrific, if rather complex, story and a great example of what can be done with a limited budget and a lot of imagination.

    Rememberence was a very good story and Iquite enjoy that one, but Ghost Light I just don't egt. I hated it. I found the story to be very confusing (it was only watching the documentary that I was able to work out what was going on) and the acting was simply aweful in places. The main dude (I couldn't tell you who he was. The grey bloke with the stupid costume) was just so anoying and pooly acted that it totally ruined it for me.
  • edited November 2009
    Talking of the 7th Doc

    I only just realised how smoking hot Sophie Aldred was as Ace, I always thought she was a bit well stereotypically dykey, and not just in Dr. Who? But she's actually really nice looking I wouldn't say no at all :D
    Every night is curry night!
  • edited November 2009
    Talking of the 7th Doc

    I only just realised how smoking hot Sophie Aldred was as Ace, I always thought she was a bit well stereotypically dykey, and not just in Dr. Who? But she's actually really nice looking I wouldn't say no at all :D

    Very nice looking in real life too, she came to the Liongate studios in Brighton to film the Dalek episode where the Daleks first learned to climb the stairs ( Rememberance of the Daleks ). The telepad which they appeared on didn`t look at all bad in the show, but in real life it was a shabby chipboard hack and slash job covered in blackboard paint. There is nothing like going to work one morning and walking past a small open cupboard door and coming face to face with a Dalek, blows your mind ! John Pertwee came there to film a pilot for a new space show, his performance was TERRIBLE, by that time he was a bumbly old man who was as convincing an actor as I am ! That was in 1988.
  • edited November 2009
    I`ve just been taking to someone about the old days at Liongate studio and he asked me if I had heard the news about Catherine tate being the new doctor. He wouldnt say more apart from the fact that some of the filming is already done and dusted ! I don`t know if there has been any mention of this on the internet or whether or not he has his usual amount of BBC inside info !
  • edited November 2009
    Dingbat wrote: »
    I`ve just been taking to someone about the old days at Liongate studio and he asked me if I had heard the news about Catherine tate being the new doctor. He wouldnt say more apart from the fact that some of the filming is already done and dusted ! I don`t know if there has been any mention of this on the internet or whether or not he has his usual amount of BBC inside info !
    Anybody told Matt Smith?
    I wanna tell you a story 'bout a woman I know...
  • edited November 2009
    karingal wrote: »
    Anybody told Matt Smith?


    Could be another offshoot of the Doctordonna syndrome.

    Back to Waters of Mars, I liked it, but thought it was a bit low-budget. Needed better sets, a cooler robot and less running up and down corridors.
    Spoiler:
  • edited November 2009
    Graz wrote: »
    Could be another offshoot of the Doctordonna syndrome.

    Back to Waters of Mars, I liked it, but thought it was a bit low-budget. Needed better sets, a cooler robot and less running up and down corridors.
    Spoiler:
    Spoiler:
  • edited November 2009
    merman wrote: »
    Spoiler:
    Spoiler:
  • edited November 2009
    Graz wrote: »
    Could be another offshoot of the Doctordonna syndrome.

    He says that there is a ring which Donna has which plays a large part in the story, there are connections to the Oode, but mainly it has a pivotal story around the Trickster and his minions, it appears that Donna has not been all that she seems for a while ! They have been brought togeather for the big Doctor-Donna-Master showdown.
  • edited November 2009
    if it cost loads to bring up all the equipmnet to mars, why did they build such long coridors to the gardens??? mongs.
  • edited November 2009
    I still haven't seen this.

    Should I watch it? It is not aimed at me. I like sci-fi fictions but I am an oldish man and not a paedo.
  • edited November 2009
    frobush wrote: »
    I still haven't seen this.

    Should I watch it? It is not aimed at me. I like sci-fi fictions but I am an oldish man and not a paedo.

    RTD has stated that it's for "children and adults" and that he sees the audience as very wide-ranging and tries to keep them all happy (he's even pretty-much on-record as saying he hasn't targetted it at sci-fi fans specifically). So of course it's for you, the same as it's for ten year olds with toy daleks and teenage girls who fancy David Tennant.
  • edited November 2009
    Graz wrote: »
    Spoiler:
    Spoiler:
Sign In or Register to comment.