To bobs, andrew rollings, psj etc

2456

Comments

  • edited December 2009
    ZnorXman wrote: »
    I have recently also resolved in my heart not to participate in birthdays either as I consider them not to be compatible with Christianity, due to the origin of both (birthdays and Christmas).

    So you aren't getting any older? You might have discovered the secret of eternal youth here....
    My test signature
  • edited December 2009
    ghbearman wrote: »
    if we can discuss religion without me being called anal, or something, I'm quite happy to discuss. for some reason that just gets my fuse blown :)

    You do realise that 'anal' is a Freudian term meaning meticulous/pedantic, right?
  • edited December 2009
    woodcock88 wrote: »
    You do realise that 'anal' is a Freudian term meaning meticulous/pedantic, right?

    from anally retentive, i believe.

    Personally, I think Freud was talking out of his arse 20% of the time (stage 2 of 5) :D

    Andrew
  • edited December 2009
    Yuletide greetings!

    :D
  • edited December 2009
    fogartylee wrote: »
    So you aren't getting any older? You might have discovered the secret of eternal youth here....

    Shhh! ... I was going to keep the secret to myself but you just had to go and blab! :grin:
  • edited December 2009
    You do realise that 'anal' is a Freudian term meaning meticulous/pedantic, right?

    That's not what my internet says. ;-)
  • edited December 2009
    Really the only acceptable form is Cristes m?sse; Christmas is just an ugly abbreviation with a life-belittling effect on everyone who even contemplates using it as a word.

    Words are for life, not just for Cristes m?sse.

    Or I could be wrong.





    No, wait, I am wrong.
  • edited December 2009
    every christmas, the same arguments. :(

    can't we all just be freinds and celebrate christmas for what it truely means, peace and love to our fellow man. i mean not to people of other faiths, they have their own holidays. you know you make a choice and you have to live with it, you can't have both. so lets all get together (with the obvious exceptions) and celebrate jesus's birthday. ok i know its not his actual birthday, but last year my birthday was on a monday and i celebrated it on the following saturday. it just seemed a bit more convienient for everone. and the queen has two birthdays, her official one and a drinking one. can't see why jesus can't have two, i mean he was the son of god. ok his pic isn't on stamps, but it could be if we all write to gordon brown.
  • edited December 2009
    1980-20.. wrote: »
    Wasnt it all down to Emperor constantine and his vision of a united Rome. Didnt he basicaly make rome a christian empire to try and consolidate a divided people. I think some of the more extreme pagan religions had been outlawed for a long time and i know caesar got fed up with them messing around with the callendar so there days were numbered anyway. But he wasnt stupid enough to get rid of all the partying.
    It was the early Roman church, the Emperor and Pope together, that moved to strictly define the Christian calendar and use it to unite and expand their rule. But Rome was on the wane by then so at the time it didn't manage to dominate the full extent of the classical Roman Empire.

    Most of the more arcane traditions were absorbed from other Pagan and Christian / Pseudo-Christian sects as the Roman Church made a later push to expand their stricture and influence from country to country. As another example, monasticism was a Greek idea, not Roman. And none of these are a patch on the things that got subsumed into South American Christianity in the following millenium. The idea of a big winter solstice knees-up came from Britain, though that was Saxon tradition imported from northern Europe. There was no such thing across Mediterranean Europe, and the Romans never fared too well in the colder north were it really originated.
    Joefish
    - IONIAN-GAMES.com -
  • edited December 2009
    karingal wrote: »
    Flamewar starter...
    I'm pretty sure I'm going to burn anyway, thanks to that Erasmus Darwin and his loony ideas...
    Joefish
    - IONIAN-GAMES.com -
  • edited December 2009
    Look! all I said was 'That Piece of Halibut Was Good Enough for Jehovah'
  • edited December 2009
    Were there witnesses?
    Joefish
    - IONIAN-GAMES.com -
  • edited December 2009
    Dunny wrote: »
    They f*ck like crazy at that time of year, moreso than usual. This symbolises... something about Jesus, I'm not sure what.

    D.

    That's completely absurd, given Jesus was a Jew and the Jews did not practice multiple partners in the first century! Plus Jesus was most likely not married - his ministry was a commitment to God and the church is called his bride in Revelation.
  • edited December 2009
    ghbearman wrote: »
    That's completely absurd, given Jesus was a Jew and the Jews did not practice multiple partners in the first century! Plus Jesus was most likely not married - his ministry was a commitment to God and the church is called his bride in Revelation.

    he was a joiner though, and you know what they're like. :p
  • edited December 2009
    ghbearman wrote: »
    That's completely absurd, given Jesus was a Jew and the Jews did not practice multiple partners in the first century! Plus Jesus was most likely not married - his ministry was a commitment to God and the church is called his bride in Revelation.
    Quite possibly the rabbit thing is another old rural symbol of new life in the Spring, like eggs, quite adeptly paralleled with the resurrection, so long as you don't persue the concept too far and ask why dead rabbits don't get up again...
    Joefish
    - IONIAN-GAMES.com -
  • edited December 2009
    mile, then I would expect the Pharisees to be able to answer Jesus whenever He claims to be sinless, but they don't.
  • edited December 2009
    joefish wrote: »
    Quite possibly the rabbit thing is another old rural symbol of new life in the Spring, quite adeptly paralleled with the resurrection, so long as you don't persue the concept too far and ask why dead rabbits don't get up again...

    The resurrection has nothing to do with this. It is more likely connectable with the vision of the dead men coming to life again in Ezekiel 37, or perhaps with the 'sacrifice' of Abraham and Isaac (where Isaac returns from the sacrifice!)
  • edited December 2009
    ghbearman wrote: »
    mile, then I would expect the Pharisees to be able to answer Jesus whenever He claims to be sinless, but they don't.

    Maybe they were scared of hypocrisy.
  • edited December 2009
    no, they practised hypocrisy - this was Jesus' problem with them (see Matthew 23)
  • edited December 2009
    ZnorXman wrote: »
    Rabbits have nothing to do with Christianity.

    Neither does Easter. :D
  • edited December 2009
    ghbearman wrote: »
    no, they practised hypocrisy - this was Jesus' problem with them (see Matthew 23)

    Maybe they were scared of further hypocrisy.
  • edited December 2009
    I don't think Jesus would have been able to live as a rabbi if he was doing stuff on the side.
  • edited December 2009
    ghbearman wrote: »
    The resurrection has nothing to do with this. It is more likely connectable with the vision of the dead men coming to life again in Ezekiel 37, or perhaps with the 'sacrifice' of Abraham and Isaac (where Isaac returns from the sacrifice!)
    I was pointing out the reasoning for how the more relaxed sects of the Christian church adapt the popular symbology of rabbits and eggs into their teachings at Easter. I have no idea where you're going with what you're saying - neither of those events have fixed dates in the calendar, and, the resurrection is also referenced a tad more directly in the Gospels.
    Joefish
    - IONIAN-GAMES.com -
  • edited December 2009
    yes there's Jonah and the whale, thanks for the reminder! But I wanted to show the resurrection is related to Old Testament rather than pagan concepts!
  • edited December 2009
    ghbearman wrote: »
    I don't think Jesus would have been able to live as a rabbi if he was doing stuff on the side.

    There is only one small letter between rabbi and rabbit.
  • edited December 2009
    There is only one small letter between rabbi and rabbit.

    and a lower case t, looks like a cross. the mystery deepens
  • edited December 2009
    ghbearman wrote: »
    yes there's Jonah and the whale, thanks for the reminder! But I wanted to show the resurrection is related to Old Testament rather than pagan concepts!
    I never tried to claim the origin of the resurrection in the Gospels was pagan - just that its celebration in British culture subsumed some pre-existing pagan tradition and symbology - just as the common celebration of Christmas has.
    Joefish
    - IONIAN-GAMES.com -
  • edited December 2009
    Oh oh this is heading down a rocky road again ! Started off okay with a 'kinda' apology.

    If people want to call it Christmas, then fair enough, if people want to call it Xmas, WOSmas, psj3809mas or whatever they want depending on what their beliefs are - again fair enough, if atheiests want to call it 'Holiday festival' or something else then fair enough, we're all different.

    If someone starts forcing something down your throat and its their way or nothing then no no no no ! (Just as I wont force it down their throat that I call it Xmas or 'holiday season'). To think this all started off with someone being kind and giving a game away and jokingly putting WOSmas.

    Unbelievable.
  • edited December 2009
    what, I can't defend my faith ?

    maybe I didn't understand yesterday that 'WOSmas' was jokey.
  • edited December 2009
    ghbearman wrote: »
    what, I can't defend my faith ?

    maybe I didn't understand yesterday that 'WOSmas' was jokey.

    Why cant i defend my belief in non-religion then ? I dont get upset when someone calls it Christmas just like i dont get upset when someone calls it a different name.

    You seriously didnt understand that WOSmas was jokey ? Oh come on, you must be an intelligent guy, how the hell did you not see the harmless joke? Someone giving a Speccy game away free at WOS as its Christmas/Xmas/whatever and jokingly put WOSmas. Thats quite shocking you didnt understand that joke, quite worrying in fact.

    If that upsets you and you dont understand that you must have a helluva stressful life when you walk down city centres and see any non-religious mention of Xmas or its festivals.

    I'm not religious one bit but I dont get upset even when I walk past a church and see a sign basically say i wont go to heaven if i dont follow God etc. We all have our own beliefs, 'some' have much stronger beliefs than others but should appreciate not everyone is so religious as themselves.

    Its views like this which put me off religion even more.
This discussion has been closed.