Check out this 1973 "games console"

1246

Comments

  • edited August 2010
    psj3809 wrote: »
    I'm not saying anyones right or wrong (thats why the bans length was the same for both).

    erm...

    7 != 30
  • edited August 2010
    guesser wrote: »
    erm...

    7 != 30

    Okay i'll rephrase that. The ban was changed so in the end AOwen (his account is active not banned) and Nick H's was the same length.

    We could go round in circles between both groups or we could just both move on and ignore each other.
  • edited August 2010
    psj3809 wrote: »
    Pot kettle black. Dunny you've come back to WOS and all you've done is mostly post here attacking Nick again.

    I came back to WOS because it became impossible for people to come to #spin to get support for ZXSpin and BASin, and also because I want to get into discussion about SpecOS. Again, I can't use #spin for that, because I've had to lock the channel down - and that's entirely because of Nick's actions.

    And you think I should be happy about this situation? You're a mod, and you've demonstrated time and again that you're not impartial. You, collectively, banned my son at Nick's bidding. Let's not forget that he was unbanned when Nick's argument for banning him was found to be false.

    D.
  • edited August 2010
    More pics of Sjakie ? PLEASE!

    Action shot....
    6731_1174079318132_1412543402_484628_4251588_n.jpg
  • edited August 2010
    Dunny wrote: »
    And you think I should be happy about this situation? You're a mod, and you've demonstrated time and again that you're not impartial. You, collectively, banned my son at Nick's bidding. Let's not forget that he was unbanned when Nick's argument for banning him was found to be false.

    D.

    I'm glad youre back but why bother with this all over again ? It wont get resolved.

    I'm totally impartial. I dont have an issue with you at all, we've had the odd bicker but nothing for either of us to get so frustrated to 'hate' each other or that despite your little hissy fit when you left.

    'Some' of your sons posts sounded like you were just telling him what to say. I mean i dont know why you wanted yourself banned ages ago (only to then post a 'few' messages via your sons account) and now youre back again ?

    What is it with people nowadays ? Why on earth do people have to ask the mods to ban them ? Why not simply not go to the site ? Why do they have to create other accounts ? Why not just use the same one to post. All ridiculous and childish.

    The mods were in a very difficult position as both sides were saying he said this/she said this etc. In the end both bans were for the same time length.

    In this thread the initial 'attacks' at Nick were poor, it was only going to cause trouble over and over and do harm not good.
  • edited August 2010
    There's no way things are going to just go back to the way they were, a lot of people are very pissed off (on both sides of this thing), and the more posts that get edited in some crazy attempt at historical revisionism, the longer the argument will drag on.
  • edited August 2010
    guesser wrote: »
    There's no way things are going to just go back to the way they were, a lot of people are very pissed off (on both sides of this thing), and the more posts that get edited in some crazy attempt at historical revisionism, the longer the argument will drag on.

    So you seriously think i should have left those posts as they were ? It'll go round and round in circles and this thread will be on page 45 with the same type of insults/arguments.
  • edited August 2010
    Basically if you have a beef take it off line...if you post it online all you do it make yourself look small and pathetic....we don't care about your bickering and attempts at making the other side look bad....all you do by trying that is make YOURSELF look bad.

    Affirmation of my theory once again..that there is balance to everything

    Nerd posters have technical superiority....but are balanced by zero social skills.
    Regular posters are technically challenged...but do get laid once in a while.


    The fly in the ointment though is still Mile who has his own category.

    :lol:

    If you are here for the 'serious' aspect of WOS...stay out of chitchat....pretty simple.
  • edited August 2010
    beanz wrote: »
    Basically if you have a beef take it off line...if you post it online all you do it make yourself look small and pathetic....we don't care about your bickering and attempts at making the other side look bad....all you do by trying that is make YOURSELF look bad.

    Affirmation of my theory once again..that there is balance to everything

    Nerd posters have technical superiority....but are balanced by zero social skills.
    Regular posters are technically challenged...but do get laid once in a while.


    The fly in the ointment though is still Mile who had his own category.

    :lol:

    **** you beanz!!

    :p
  • edited August 2010
    psj3809 wrote: »
    So you seriously think i should have left those posts as they were ? It'll go round and round in circles and this thread will be on page 45 with the same type of insults/arguments.

    I expect it will anyway. Until everyone involved is banned. The only difference being that if all the posts get deleted there'll be another thread started next week asking why so and so is banned. Then it'll all be gone over again for the benefit of the next person who missed it.
  • edited August 2010
    beanz wrote: »
    Basically if you have a beef take it off line...if you post it online all you do it make yourself look small and pathetic.

    that works great until one of the parties posts the edited highlights online.
  • edited August 2010
    Again the mods cant win. (Wheres that picture of the unicorn and the rainbow when i need it)

    If i leave all this insulting she said/he said crap then it'll go on and on and a lot of posters i know wont like it. If I edit the posts so it doesnt make the situation worse you get slated for that.
  • edited August 2010
    There needs to be a change to the moderation structure around here, which involves moderators that actually investigate complaints rather than just banning without thinking. In short, moderators that aren't sheep to be led around.

    Until that happens, this sort of thing will happen again and again when the next victim is chosen.

    D.
  • edited August 2010
    guesser wrote: »
    that works great until one of the parties posts the edited highlights online.

    It continues to work great if the 'bigger man' doesn't take the bait...be the bigger man perhaps...as stated..the only people who really care are those crying about it.
  • edited August 2010
    beanz wrote: »
    It continues to work great if the 'bigger man' doesn't take the bait...be the bigger man perhaps...as stated..the only people who really care are those crying about it.

    this iz internetz, no one is the big man. jus a load of kiddies acting the big man.
  • edited August 2010
    Dunny wrote: »
    There needs to be a change to the moderation structure around here, which involves moderators that actually investigate complaints rather than just banning without thinking. In short, moderators that aren't sheep to be led around.

    Until that happens, this sort of thing will happen again and again when the next victim is chosen.

    D.

    Disagree....Mods are human not machines...they do a good job...all the bans were legit....should have been permanent if anything.
  • edited August 2010
    psj3809 wrote: »
    The mods were in a very difficult position as both sides were saying he said this/she said this etc. In the end both bans were for the same time length.
    No, the mods were in a stunningly simple position. Your job is to simply moderate the content of the forum on a post-by-post or thread-by-thread basis. You made the job impossible by listening to one person's opinion/story of the motives of others, and considering so-called "evidence" from outside of the forum itself, like IRC and Facebook, which should be absolutely no concern of yours at all.
  • edited August 2010
    beanz wrote: »
    Basically if you have a beef take it off line...if you post it online all you do it make yourself look small and pathetic....we don't care about your bickering and attempts at making the other side look bad....all you do by trying that is make YOURSELF look bad.
    Usually I rarely agree with Beanz but this is spot on. Strange days indeed! :)
  • edited August 2010
    Dunny wrote: »
    There needs to be a change to the moderation structure around here, which involves moderators that actually investigate complaints rather than just banning without thinking. In short, moderators that aren't sheep to be led around.

    Until that happens, this sort of thing will happen again and again when the next victim is chosen.

    D.

    I dont think it will. Apart from this whole sorry episode, previous to this there was the Cornishdavey ban and the Rubberkeys one. Its been pretty peaceful around here.

    We havent had 'two sides' like this previous.

    You can blame the mods all you want. At the end of the day we're all 30+ something adults acting like kids and bicking over just rubbish.

    Its like a frickin Westlife forum with girls arguing over who they find the fittest.

    Again you think youre correct, others dont think you are. The mods gave the people a ban the same length (and to be fair yes a longer ban for Aowen was unjustified) but we had to make a decision. We couldnt wait for weeks to gather up all the evidence, interview people etc while we had people complaining left and right about the state of the forum due to a 'small' number of people who basically dont get on.

    We have people creating multiple accounts, we have 'secret' chat rooms, we have 'he said/she said', we have people saying 'right i'm going - ban me !' and then coming back. Its like an Eastenders omnibus.

    Look you and others dont get on with Nick. Nick doesnt like you either (Sounding like star wars). Just avoid each other. This will never get sorted out in a thread with insults left and right. If i leave them it makes things worse, if i delete them then its 'poor modding' etc

    Just going round in circles.

    Plus i have to go out now for a few hours for a meeting so it looks like this will turn into some barren Mad Max type wasteland and turn into anarchy !
  • edited August 2010
    beanz wrote: »
    It continues to work great if the 'bigger man' doesn't take the bait...be the bigger man perhaps...as stated..the only people who really care are those crying about it.

    And not read the threads? you mean like you're doing?...

    When I get insulted and called a troll, I think I have the same right to be annoyed as anyone else.
  • edited August 2010
    guesser wrote: »
    And not read the threads? you mean like you're doing?...

    When I get insulted and called a troll, I think I have the same right to be annoyed as anyone else.

    Was you one of the ones banned??....

    There is a difference to being annoyed than causing the trouble we have seen.....if you fail to see the difference I refer you to my 'balance' post :lol:
  • edited August 2010
    psj3809 wrote: »
    we have 'secret' chat rooms

    so we're supposed to keep personal disputes off WoS, but when we communicate with each other off WoS we're a secret society.
  • edited August 2010
    guesser wrote: »
    so we're supposed to keep personal disputes off WoS, but when we communicate with each other off WoS we're a secret society.

    PMs.....what do you feel is achieved by airing this on the forums?
  • edited August 2010
    beanz wrote: »
    Was you one of the ones banned??....

    briefly yes. Though that's not particularly relevant... I'm referring to NickH calling me a troll several times, including on his "secret" facebook page!11!one!ZOMG
  • edited August 2010
    beanz wrote: »
    pms.....what do you feel is achieved by airing this on the forums?


    qfe........
  • jpjp
    edited August 2010
    guesser wrote: »
    briefly yes. Though that's not particularly relevant... I'm referring to NickH calling me a troll several times, including on his "secret" facebook page!11!one!ZOMG

    We've had a [forum based] argument before - deleted by the MODS to keep everyone happy...
  • edited August 2010
    beanz wrote: »
    what do you feel is achieved by airing this on the forums?

    I have no idea any more :-o

    (this post took me a while to edit...)
  • edited August 2010
    guesser wrote: »
    that works great until one of the parties posts the edited highlights online.

    I think at least two parties have done that now.
  • edited August 2010
    jp wrote: »
    deleted by the MODS to keep everyone happy...

    That worked well... :razz:
  • edited August 2010
    Then let the babies throw there toys and don't support either side my friend :)
Sign In or Register to comment.