ebay picture thiefs

124

Comments

  • edited December 2011
    ccowley wrote: »
    I think of little else.

    Have you thought of an education? Learning to spell? Learning to be less-easily manipulated?

    Why on earth have you put "-" between less and easily? That is twice you have criticised my spelling and twice you have arsed it up. I will make it easier for you and sleep now, save you getting it wrong again.
  • edited December 2011
    scunny wrote: »
    Agreed, but in an internet forum, repeated spelling nitpicking and pedantism is merely tedious.
    scunny wrote: »
    Why on earth have you put "-" between less and easily?
    I win!
    I will make it easier for you and sleep now, save you getting it wrong again.
    Night, loser. :p
  • edited December 2011
    ccowley wrote: »
    I win!

    Night, loser. :p

    Lol, sad, sad troll
  • edited December 2011
    scunny wrote: »
    Lol, sad, sad troll
    Cheers. Sometimes people make it too easy.
  • edited December 2011
    I hath only read the first and last three pages of this thread.

    I am undisappoint.
  • edited December 2011
    Again, time to laugh.

    Where are the PROOFINGS of this? Bring me REAL EVIDENCES and I'll give you the reason FOR DENIENCES!!11one!!
  • edited December 2011
    Alarm wrote: »
    I hath only read the first and last three pages of this thread.

    I am undisappoint.

    I have read both the first and last three pages. There are only three. :p
  • edited December 2011
    Anyway, we need to get this back on topic. Copyright violation is a serious matter. I don't even think fog should be posting these pictures online; surely the carpet pattern is (c) Carpetright and reproducing it online without their permission is theft?
  • edited December 2011
    I've caught fog using my plate before too, it's just not cricket.
  • edited December 2011
    Lol @ this topic's tags!

    Re-using other seller's pictures should be avoided, not because of the copyright argument, but because it's not right. Anyone with a moral standard should feel guilty when they're about to do it.

    The amount of time that it takes to use a 3rd party app to defeat the right-click protection or using print screen and then saving, cropping and what not could be used to take a picture and upload it. Oh, wait, that would mean you would have to stand up from the chair! :lol:

    Nowadays I take pics, start and manage auctions, all from my mobile phone. Simple and easy.
  • edited December 2011
    zxbruno wrote: »
    Lol @ this topic's tags!
    There seems to be a limit of adding two tags per user... there were several others I wanted to add. :(
    Re-using other seller's pictures should be avoided, not because of the copyright argument, but because it's not right. Anyone with a moral standard should feel guilty when they're about to do it.
    Yep, I agree. The photo in an auction should be of the actual item being sold, not a similar item that was sold by someone else in the past.
  • fogfog
    edited December 2011
    ccowley wrote: »
    Anyway, we need to get this back on topic. Copyright violation is a serious matter. I don't even think fog should be posting these pictures online; surely the carpet pattern is (c) Carpetright and reproducing it online without their permission is theft?

    you take the pic.. you own copyright.. much as if I took a pic of say your house or car.. just because you own it .. although if you take pics in certain parts of London , you might get in trouble.

    20 pages yet? I'll humour you lot.. obv. it's done on IRC etc.
    zxbruno wrote: »
    Lol @ this topic's tags!

    whats that about ? I see it mentioned a few times now..
  • edited December 2011
    fog wrote: »
    ...whats that about ? I see it mentioned a few times now..

    The tags are at the bottom of the thread-page.
  • fogfog
    edited December 2011
    oh I see , very good.. they are funny.. sure someone off here wrote em ? :p
  • edited December 2011
    Is this a new discovery, that there's no swear filter on the tag list?
    Joefish
    - IONIAN-GAMES.com -
  • edited December 2011
    joefish wrote: »
    Is this a new discovery, that there's no swear filter on the tag list?

    Hmmm, which words in the tags list should be in the swear filter ... or rather, which words therein ought to be filtered?
  • edited December 2011
    fog wrote: »
    you take the pic.. you own copyright.. much as if I took a pic of say your house or car..
    But I put my car in a jiffy bag and sent it to myself recorded delivery. That means I own the copywrite on it and you can't take pictures without my permission.
  • edited December 2011
    ccowley wrote: »
    But I put my car in a jiffy bag and sent it to myself recorded delivery. That means I own the copywrite on it and you can't take pictures without my permission.

    I pity your postman ;)
  • edited December 2011
    Wookiee wrote: »
    I pity your postman ;)

    why?

    he gets a free car for christmas. :p
  • edited December 2011
    ccowley wrote: »
    But I put my car in a jiffy bag and sent it to myself recorded delivery. That means I own the copywrite on it and you can't take pictures without my permission.

    Actually, he can take pictures left and right, nilly willy he just can't publish them without your permission.
  • edited December 2011
    ZnorXman wrote: »
    Actually, he can take pictures left and right, nilly willy he just can't publish them without your permission.
    <narrows eyes> OK, who told you about fog's pictures of my nilly willy?
  • edited December 2011
    ccowley wrote: »
    <narrows eyes> OK, who told you about fog's pictures of my nilly willy?
    Oh, is that what the auction was for? I couldn't make out what it was in the photographs, even with the 1p coin for size comparison.
  • edited December 2011
    ccowley wrote: »
    <narrows eyes> OK, who told you about fog's pictures of my nilly willy?

    Fog did, he's been sharing them for a laugh ... without your permission :razz:
























































    (In case the reader missed it, the preceding sentence was meant solely as a humourous comment)
  • edited December 2011
    ZnorXman wrote: »
    Fog did, he's been sharing them for a laugh ... without your permission :razz:
    /me puts willy in a jiffy bag and sends it to myself by recorded delivery
  • edited December 2011
    these posts don't count towards the 20 page goal, as they are just normal ramblings.

    :p
  • edited December 2011
    mile wrote: »
    these posts don't count towards the 20 page goal, as they are just normal ramblings.

    :p
    I wrote that last week, you thieve!
  • edited December 2011
    ccowley wrote: »
    /me puts willy in a jiffy bag and sends it to myself by recorded delivery

    *Matthew Smith starts legal proceedings...*

    "He didn't even poke holes on the bag for poor Willy to breathe!"
  • edited December 2011
    Alarm wrote: »
    mile wrote: »
    these posts don't count towards the 20 page goal, as they are just normal ramblings.

    :p

    I wrote that last week, you thieve!

    *Alarm becomes alarmed*
  • edited December 2011
    mile wrote: »
    these posts don't count towards the 20 page goal, as they are just normal ramblings.
    :p
    Grrr! I will have to try to be more subtle in next month's copyright car-crash thread, then. :p
  • edited December 2011
    ccowley wrote: »
    Grrr! I will have to try to be more subtle in next month's copyright car-crash thread, then. :p

    you need to do one in a forum where PK might see it, thats is sure to get people moaning.

    maybe start a speccy related t shirt business, that always goes down well. :p
Sign In or Register to comment.