New category of "commercial" games

edited April 2012 in Infoseek database
Hi Martijn,

I was thinking about an idea which I already commented, but in a rawer way before.
Its about these games that we know were released commercially, but not in the ordinary way, but in mail order way.
Do you think it would be possible to add this category, to separate the games which were released in general shops, computer shops and so on from the ones which were only released and therefore available by mail order?? (I have a big quantity of these games from Spain catallogued, basically the homebrew text adventures)
Post edited by Ivanzx on

Comments

  • edited April 2012
    As commented previously, I would've thought that it would have been almost impossible to create an accurate database with those categories particularly given that a lot of "commercial sold in shops" titles actually started out as, or were sold alongside the same titles, as "commercial mail order".

    So many entries in the database, for titles I know were available in the shops like WH Smiths, have magazine adverts where the companies were also selling them by mail order. The two distribution methods weren't mutually exclusive during the lifetime of the Spectrum. Certainly not in the UK anyway.
  • edited April 2012
    Strident wrote: »
    As commented previously, I would've thought that it would have been almost impossible to create an accurate database with those categories particularly given that a lot of "commercial sold in shops" titles actually started out as, or were sold alongside the same titles, as "commercial mail order".

    So many entries in the database, for titles I know were available in the shops like WH Smiths, have magazine adverts where the companies were also selling them by mail order. The two distribution methods weren't mutually exclusive during the lifetime of the Spectrum. Certainly not in the UK anyway.

    Well, in those cases we would have to use the category that was the first to happen. As a release, and re-release. To my experience with the spanish market, there wont be many cases, but it could be that in the UK is more complicated?
  • edited April 2012
    Ivanzx wrote: »
    Well, in those cases we would have to use the category that was the first to happen. As a release, and re-release. To my experience with the spanish market, there wont be many cases, but it could be that in the UK is more complicated?
    Release/re-release doesn't come into it. So many titles were sold via mail order to the public direct from the same software company that supplied copies to high street chains like WH Smith & Boots. Titles released in stores, particularly in the early years, were often featured in magazine reviews and advertisements with the software company's address to order from.

    Big name titles, such as Football Manager, fall into both categories (commercial mail order and commercial retail) and make any delineation pretty difficult and ultimately a little meaningless.

    I can understand, a little, your desire to demote titles like home grown adventures from the commercial category but I really don't see the point or how it can be done either accurately or comprehensively.
  • edited April 2012
    Hmm the main point would be to make a clear difference between those titles released in what we can call "mayor" chains of commerce, and those which were released in a different, homebrew, maily way.

    Personally, those games which, like football manager, were released in both ways, I would catalogue them as commercial; and only those which were released exclusively via mail would be tagged as "mail released" type...
  • edited April 2012
    I still don't see the point.

    Anyway, a better solution would be to provide this sort of detail about the actual software companies in some sort of bio rather than completely have to re-evaluate the status of every game in the database.
  • edited April 2012
    Strident wrote: »
    I still don't see the point.

    Anyway, a better solution would be to provide this sort of detail about the actual software companies in some sort of bio rather than completely have to re-evaluate the status of every game in the database.

    Well, even if its a big task, we have been doing similar stuff, like, for example, checking hundred games to determine if there were differences between 48 and 128k versions. It took some time, but with the help of several people is something that can be done.

    Moreover, I dont think we have to reevaluate the status of all the games, I even think that most of these games are quite known for some people (mostly homebrew adventures and late years spectrum releases). I would say that 95% of the archive wouldnt even have to be evaluate...
  • edited April 2012
    Ivanzx wrote: »
    Moreover, I dont think we have to reevaluate the status of all the games, I even think that most of these games are quite known for some people (mostly homebrew adventures and late years spectrum releases). I would say that 95% of the archive wouldnt even have to be evaluate...
    You still haven't set out the exact specifications for your proposed categories.

    Late years Spectrum releases might be easy to evaluate but I don't think early Spectrum titles would.
  • edited April 2012
    Some random examples. On the surface these would probably look like "commercial mail order" titles but if you dig deep into the related adverts and links they could be classified as "commercial retail".

    http://www.worldofspectrum.org/infoseek.cgi?regexp=^Centipede$&pub=^DK%27Tronics+Ltd$&loadpics=3

    http://www.worldofspectrum.org/infoseek.cgi?regexp=^Games+Tape+1$&pub=^Gilsoft+International$&loadpics=3

    http://www.worldofspectrum.org/infoseek.cgi?regexp=^Bomber$&pub=^Llamasoft$&loadpics=3
  • edited April 2012
    To be honest, I don't really want to add this separation anyway (as 'commercial' means 'money changing hands', which is correct for both variations).

    I would much rather get proper listings for all titles for which the publication method is entirely unknown (2,384 titles, or 10% of the database!).
  • edited April 2012
    Martijn, I have a small number of tapes in the unknown category (e.g. Basicode 3, La Ballade du Lutin etc) - what info are you after exactly? I can confirm both tapes just mentioned look professionally produced, if that helps.
  • edited April 2012
    ghbearman wrote: »
    Martijn, I have a small number of tapes in the unknown category (e.g. Basicode 3, La Ballade du Lutin etc) - what info are you after exactly? I can confirm both tapes just mentioned look professionally produced, if that helps.

    The options are: Commercial, Freeware, Public Domain, GPL, Creative Commons or Rental (or type-in, compilation or covertape) - all of the values you can search for in the advanced engine.

    I'll set the 2 you mention to Commercial, thanks!
  • edited April 2012
    plus, all of the Qbit titles are commercial, originally priced ?2.99. On the packaging, the company name has no space, and is all capitals: QBIT.

    edit: plus, Super Golf was also published for the C64.
  • edited April 2012
    Freeware, Public Domain, GPL, Creative Commons

    Yyyyyy, what's the difference? ;) And why so many categories?


    Spectrum programs were either sold for money or they were some amateur attempt done for fun.

    In case of software that has never been sold legal things are mostly unspoken. Some teenager wrote a game, showed it to a few friends, his cassette was recovered 25 years later. What's the licence? :)
  • edited April 2012
    ghbearman wrote: »
    plus, all of the Qbit titles are commercial, originally priced ?2.99. On the packaging, the company name has no space, and is all capitals: QBIT.

    edit: plus, Super Golf was also published for the C64.

    The various suggested changes have been made.
  • edited April 2012
    Nah, I've a Rental only tape, that looks professionally done. (Castle Quest by Wildest Dreams)

    That doesn't fit into either category you mention, Ralf.
  • edited April 2012
    Ralf wrote: »
    Yyyyyy, what's the difference? ;) And why so many categories?


    Spectrum programs were either sold for money or they were some amateur attempt done for fun.

    The various possible values have clearly specified legal implications.
    They determine what you can do with the software, from 'just copy it for free, author retains the copyright' (Freeware) to 'whatever you want, including selling it as your own work' (Public Domain).
    In case of software that has never been sold legal things are mostly unspoken. Some teenager wrote a game, showed it to a few friends, his cassette was recovered 25 years later. What's the licence? :)
    That would be 'unknown', which is what started my question. :-)
  • edited April 2012
    I'd like to say that I don't think it's a good idea to split the "commercial" tag into different parts if it's not possible to just search on "commercial" as a whole.

    I'd also like to see to a searchable option like "non-commercial" that covers everything other than "commercial" and "unknown". Note that if it's too much work than just disregard my request. :)
  • edited April 2012
    Easy Morse by Harold Bentley is definitely commercial as I have the sales advert somewhere. (if I can find the tape I'll upload the loading screen!)
  • edited April 2012
    Easy Morse is now listed as a commercial program.
Sign In or Register to comment.