Judge Dredd

edited November 2013 in Chit chat
Saw the movie DREDD tonight, on the free trial of Nowtv from Sky on xbox.

I liked it. It was better than the Stallone one, though I did actually like that too. Got me to thinking though, I could have sworn in a very early Judge Dredd comic, I didn't have the original it would have been in a compilation 200AD special, there was an appearance of a police officer? A rather startled and overwhelmed officer, had a highish rank too if I remember, and was only in a few frames.

Is there any official back story of when police were fazed out in the mega cities?
Post edited by thx1138 on
«1

Comments

  • edited October 2013
    I thought it was an awful film, I much preferred the Stallone one. I'm told that stomps all over Dredd canon though (having only ever flicked through the odd one or two and been largely disinterested I wouldn't know), so I suppose it's less surprising most fans didn't think much of it.
  • edited October 2013
    Great film - and they kept a couple of cannon touches: Dredd not removing his helmet being an important one :-)
    No one important.
  • edited October 2013
    I enjoyed it myself. I saw it in 3D and some of those effects were amazing in places! I've never been into comic books so know bugger all about the Judges or the back story, so just went into it for the 3D effects and a bit of mindless violence ;-)

    I enjoyed it!
  • edited October 2013
    It blew the pants off the Stallone version!

    Good to see Judge Anderson in there as well. Lots of nice touches that fit with the original stories. I liked it.

    The Stallone one would have been ok as a film if they hadn't tried to kid us he was Judge Dredd. He was just Soooo not Dredd.
  • edited October 2013
    I am the laaaaaaaaaaaw you wont **** around no morrrrrrrrrrrre
    Professional Mel-the-Bell Simulator................"So realistic, I found myself reaching for the Kleenex King-Size!" - Richard Darling
  • edited October 2013
    I'm not a Judge Dredd/2000 AD fan, but I thought the new film was excellent (Dredd was played by Dr McCoy from the new Star Trek films, I wouldn't have thought to cast him as Dredd, but he turned out great, didn't he?), the total opposite of the Stallone rubbish.

    I don't know how true/false either films are to the Dredd mythos, but I do think that the new film is great for action film fans, whereas Stallone's version isn't.
  • edited October 2013
    I think one of the problems with the Stallone one was that he was paid $15 million back in 1995 to play Dredd. I can't see many film financiers wanting to pay that much and not even have their star's face on the screen. It was a brave, but totally correct move to have Karl Urban keep the helmet on.
  • edited October 2013
    There seemed to be a lot of visuals from the comics, like the dead bodies looked like they do in the comics somehow.
  • edited October 2013
    best film i've seen this year.

    needs a sequel though.
  • edited October 2013
    A very good film, I highly enjoyed Dredd!
  • edited October 2013
    Dredd 3d is true to the comic book (at least what I read up to the mid 90's) only let down by the city scape and the vehicles (present day cars/van in the future?), Stallones version has a better city scape and vehicles but suffers from trying to shoe horn every name (especially the chief justices) into the film regardless if they are from the same time or not.
  • edited October 2013
    I was a bit disappointed that it was all just about one block. The opening city scape was disappointing too. However, the actual action and characters were a much better version of Judge Dredd than the Stallone version. I'd certainly like to see more of this version of Dredd.
    Joefish
    - IONIAN-GAMES.com -
  • edited October 2013
    In answer to the original post, there were some police officers in a handful of early strips. This was because the scripts had been farmed out to various hacks before it was launched proper and so the back story and setting etc would have been fairly light on detail at the time. Things settled down once the strip creator (John Wagner) took over the main writing duties.
  • edited October 2013
    thx1138 wrote: »
    Is there any official back story of when police were fazed out in the mega cities?

    It was shortly before World War 3. Judges were brought in to replace police in the Mega Cities as regular justice wasn't working in conurbations of that size. Standard police forces remained in smaller settlements.

    The Judges were initially just a peacekeeping force, but in the chaos after World War 3, they were asked to assume controlling power to retain order, basically becoming a dictatorship.

    The three Mega-Cities - Mega City One (conglomeration of NYC and other cities on the Eastern Seaboard of the US), Mega City Two (California Coast) and Texas City declared city-statehood and their Judges ruled their respective cities independently of one another. The US as an entity was destroyed, with pretty much all the rest of it now being a radioactive wasteland known as 'The Cursed Earth'.
  • edited October 2013
    There was a short series involving judge Fargo and the origins of Dredd and Rico and the whole justice system, but I can't find it at the mo.

    This thread nudged me into watching the film again last night, and it improves with multiple views as you get to notice more of the details and nice little touches.

    I wish this had been advertised more and released in more cinemas as it deserves a wider audience imho.
  • edited October 2013
    Dredd did remove his helmet a couple of times in the earlier 2000ad but his face was always obscured, it was also suggested that he has horrific facial injuries which is why the helmet never comes off.

    AD8-Page29_zpsc8f6375b.jpg
  • edited October 2013
    Dredd did remove his helmet a couple of times in the earlier 2000ad but his face was always obscured, it was also suggested that he has horrific facial injuries which is why the helmet never comes off.

    Another reason according to Wagner is that Dredd represents the faceless cop.
    from Wikipedia: "It sums up the facelessness of justice − justice has no soul. So it isn't necessary for readers to see Dredd's face, and I don't want you to."

    Agree that the new one is much better than the Stallone version by miles.
  • edited October 2013
    It was ok but you could tell it was low budget. Hope they have enough to do a properly budgeted sequel.

    EDIT: Was a bit too rapey as well.
  • edited October 2013
    It was ok but you could tell it was low budget. Hope they have enough to do a properly budgeted sequel.

    EDIT: Was a bit too rapey as well.

    It supposedly cost $35 million dollars to produce - now whilst thats not in Avatar territory - it's not small potatoes either.
  • edited October 2013
    I have to do it. cant hold on much longer.

    "He's Dredd 'JIM', Dredd"




    :D:D:D:D:D:D:D
  • edited October 2013
    Jimmo wrote: »
    Another reason according to Wagner is that Dredd represents the faceless cop.
    from Wikipedia: "It sums up the facelessness of justice − justice has no soul. So it isn't necessary for readers to see Dredd's face, and I don't want you to."

    Agree that the new one is much better than the Stallone version by miles.

    Miles directed that film? He kept that quiet.
  • edited October 2013
    thx1138 wrote: »
    Miles directed that film? He kept that quiet.

    wouldn't you
  • edited October 2013
    I seem to remember the police in the original strips (long time reader, here). Mike McMahon, one of the early artists (actually does a lot of artwork for video games now - and is a thoroughly nice chap), once drew a strip where Dredd makes an arrest, ties the 'perp' up to a holding post for the police to handle.

    Just for interest, one of co-creators of the Dredd character, Carlos Ezquerra, drew the graphic novel that accompanied the '95 film, so had to draw Dredd's face. In my opinion, if anyone gets to say what Dredd looked like, it's Carlos. If you see it, I think he's drawn his Dredd, rather than his Stallone.

    There was also a strip drawn by Cam Kennedy in the mid-80s where he drew way too much of his face profile (Dredd was in the bath at the time).

    As for the film, totally agree with comments about the city-scape and vehicles; however, the grittiness is spot on. If you know your 2000AD artists, then the '95 vision was Ron Smith, and the recent one was 100% Mike McMahon.

    As for a sequel... don't hold your breath. It doesn't look like it was quite successful enough.

    Okay, I'm all geeked out for a Tuesday morning. Time for work.

    Tobo.
  • edited October 2013
    joefish wrote: »
    I was a bit disappointed that it was all just about one block. The opening city scape was disappointing too. However, the actual action and characters were a much better version of Judge Dredd than the Stallone version. I'd certainly like to see more of this version of Dredd.

    I've not seen the new Dredd film but I expect that a lot of the things that let people down were a budget issue. If they'd had, say, twice the budget to play with you'd doubtless have seen a "proper" Megacity and futuristic vehicles.

    I saw the Stallone version ages ago and, whilst I know only a little about the original comic strip, I could still tell it was largely a travesty. Stallone was, for Hollywood, clearly more important that the comic book license and this lead to the infamous "no helmet" thing for most of the film. It also, from what I can gather, got rid of the comic book's satire and shades-of-grey morality and turned the Judges into a heroic organisation who were there to protect freedom and democracy rather than an essentially morally neutral ultra-authoritarian dictatorship who are only as "good" as the laws they enforce.

    I gather the new film didn't do all that well in the cinema and people are pinning their hopes on DVD/netflix to demonstrate a wider audience and maybe get some more milage out of the series. Poor marketing probably didn't help (I didn't notice any pre-release hype and only heard of it when it came out and film reviewers started talking about it), nor did releasing a comic book film with an 18 certificate.
  • edited October 2013
    Zagreb wrote: »
    I gather the new film didn't do all that well in the cinema and people are pinning their hopes on DVD/netflix to demonstrate a wider audience and maybe get some more milage out of the series. Poor marketing probably didn't help (I didn't notice any pre-release hype and only heard of it when it came out and film reviewers started talking about it), nor did releasing a comic book film with an 18 certificate.

    Lack of advertising has got to be the largest failure of the film.

    However, I don't think it helps that it was shot for 3d ( which adds a significant amount to filming cost's and imho adds nothing ) which in turn limited the release to 3d only cinemas.
  • edited October 2013
    thanks Tobo, that answered my question, sure I've read that actual one you describe, I just couldn't remember exactly.

    I used to have hundreds of comics but gave them away, never really been one of lifes collectors, instead of that brief period where I collected retro games. Liked reading them th
  • edited October 2013
    thx1138 wrote: »
    thanks Tobo, that answered my question, sure I've read that actual one you describe, I just couldn't remember exactly.

    I used to have hundreds of comics but gave them away, never really been one of lifes collectors, instead of that brief period where I collected retro games. Liked reading them th

    Wouldn't you just download a torrent of them? Reading magazines/comics on a laptop or tablet is great. Not as good (if you ask me) as having the real paper item, but it's much more convenient as you can store stacks of them on one hard drive or memory card.

    A quick search of a well known torrent engine (I don't think WOS allows torrent links to copyright material, pm me if you want the links)

    shows a lot of 2000 AD torrents, and the main two are;

    1) Judge Dredd Collected from 2000AD progs 0001 - 1829 (1977 - 2013) (complete) (Inc. Specials &... (Size: 7.13 GB), includes Judge Dredd Collected from Annuals & Specials (1977 - 1999) - 7.13 GB

    and

    2) 2000AD Progs 1100 - 1854 (& Annuals 2000 - 2013 + FCBD) - 14.66 GB

    Granted there's a lot of overlap, but you don't have to download all files in a torrent. And it will take a while to download this lot, but just leave the PC on for a few days and you'll soon get them. Anyway, I'm not familiar with 2000 AD, so I'm not sure, but it does look like this is everthing you'd want, unless there were 2000 AD/Judge Dredd spin offs you want (which are probably also available for download).
  • edited October 2013
    I wouldn't no, as I've never understood torrents or how they work, or what to do.
  • edited October 2013
    My brother's a big 2000AD fan, so I've been reading random Dredd stories for years...The new film is about 7000x better than the Stallone rubbish, although to give Sly his due, he did actually say he was willing to wear the helmet for the whole film, but the film makers wanted his face in it so it put more bums on seats.....

    There is talk of a Dredd 3D sequel maybe happening, as the film has proven very popular on DVD, sitting at the top of the charts for a couple of weeks, and there's an official petition for one. Karl Urban has said he'd be happy to keep portraying Dredd too, and most fans should be okay with that as he was pretty good!

    Oh, and it kind of already has a sequel, that's appearing in the Judge Dredd Megazine right now!
  • edited October 2013
    I'm not that into 3d films, and I must admit, I noticed that this film looked like a 3d contender and one I wouldn't mind seeing with the old silly goggles on, or the newer ones even :D
Sign In or Register to comment.