Did no one watch Sherlock?

edited January 2014 in Chit chat
I've just finished watching last Sunday's episode of Sherlock ('His Last Vow'), and it was *fantastic*. How come no one's mentioned it yet?

Yet when Big Brother or I'm a Celebrity* Get Me Out Of Here are on the country goes mad talking about them. We really don't deserve quality programing...

Anyway, for those of you who did watch one of the best programs ever made (and if not, load up BBC iplayer now, turn off your mobile (people daft enough not to have watched it are sure to have mobile phones!), and watch all three episode!!!), don't you agree;
Spoiler:




No doubt karingal will be along to rubbish the program now - he'll say "It was awful, so I didn't watch it. A terrible program. Or book. Or drink. Whatever it was that ewgf liked". :lol:


* And by 'celebrity', they mean Lionel Blaire's hairdresser, or a page 3 model who was once photographed with a footballer.
Post edited by ewgf on
«1

Comments

  • edited January 2014
    I saw it, I liked it. I even made a point of watching it without using my PC at the same time :)

    I agree, it's one of the best programs on TV at the moment. Actual proper TV rather than general public being stupid, quiz shows and 'celebrities' (largely from soaps and 'reality' shows that I don't watch) also being stupid.
  • edited January 2014
    I've not seen any of the series and I probably won't either as I'm too busy messing about on my mobile phone :p
  • edited January 2014
    I bit the bullet and downloaded the shows the other day. I've watched the first two so far and they are blooming brilliant - I hang my head in shame that I didn't watch them from the start.

    Talking of Sherlock Holmes, does anyone else watch Elementary? That's also surprisingly good and Dr Watson is much, much better looking than Martin Freeman :-)
  • edited January 2014
    I don't know - this series has been more drippy than most.
    First off they follow a hugely witty opening by shamelessly ripping off a far superior Alan Moore plot, but hopelessly shown off-schedule. Then the second one had a good mystery to it, but was more contrived than a Poirot whodunnit to get all the relevant parties in the same room. Finally, the last one had a few clever twists, but it was pointless and contrived writing to have a go at Watson's mental state, and exactly what use is a blackmailer without evidence or a back-up plan?
    Joefish
    - IONIAN-GAMES.com -
  • edited January 2014
    will never be better than jeremy brett, but fills up a time slot and a nice distraction while dr who is off air.

    the house keeper and her sorid past does give me a chuckle though.

    thought the end of the last episode was a bit rubbish, seems to be just a cliffhanger to get people discussing theories.
  • edited January 2014
    ewgf...
    Spoiler:
  • edited January 2014
    I didn't bother watching it as episode 2 of this series was so poor. Very soap-opera / hollyoaks-ish and generally pap. Put me off watching any more.

    Shame, as I was just getting into it as the Baskerville story of the last series was really good.
  • Yep Great program.
    Didn't like the Hounds of Baskerville one. That was just stupid and not a patch on the original story.

    Joefish: everyone thought he had evidence, which is pretty much the same thing.
  • edited January 2014
    I wish they did them in batches of four rather than three. There doesn't seem to have been much space to breathe this series. I loved the first two stories but it would've been nice to have a "normal" episode slotted in there somewhere, with a proper focussed case, before that finale.

    I enjoyed the third episode, even though it sat oddly next to the other two that were much different in terms of pace, structure and how they were cut together.

    Saying that, this series has been great. The two leads are so settled in their roles and the guest stars have been spot on. I loved the casting of Mary and also Sherlock's parents. (The young lad playing flashback Sherlock also kept things in the family)
  • edited January 2014
    Vampyre wrote: »
    I bit the bullet and downloaded the shows the other day. I've watched the first two so far and they are blooming brilliant - I hang my head in shame that I didn't watch them from the start.

    Talking of Sherlock Holmes, does anyone else watch Elementary? That's also surprisingly good and Dr Watson is much, much better looking than Martin Freeman :-)

    I can't watch Sherlock, Cummerbund plays too autistic and it grates. Elementary gets the balance just right, a far better production than the Brit tripe. Johhny Lee Miller is incredibly watchable, both OTT and restrained at once, you can see him physically holding things in.
  • edited January 2014
    Elementary gets the balance just right, a far better production than the Brit tripe. Johhny Lee Miller is incredibly watchable, both OTT and restrained at once, you can see him physically holding things in.

    I honestly didn't think that JLM had that level of performance in him. In a way it's approaching over-acting but the restraint that you mention is quite remarkable and makes the character eminently interesting. The storylines are invariably good too. Season 1's ending could quite easily have been a series ending!

    It also doesn't hurt that we get a flash of Watson's luscious legs every now and then either ;-)
  • edited January 2014
    Episode 1:
    Spoiler:
    Episode 2:
    Spoiler:
    Episode 3:
    Spoiler:
  • edited January 2014
    I enjoyed the final episode although the season overall has been the weakest so far. Hopefully things will return to the high standard of the previous seasons next time (hopefully sooner than two years).

    'A Scandal In Belgravia' is my favourite episode overall and I can't see them beating that one soon. :)
    Spoiler:
  • edited January 2014
    Watched one once but didn't like the way it was moved to a modern setting so gave it a miss. It's like remaking Red Dwarf and setting it in Victorian England or something.

    I preferred the classic portrayals, where Holmes did a lot of consulting timetables and catching cabs and trains...
  • edited January 2014
    Morkin wrote: »
    where Holmes did a lot of consulting timetables and catching cabs and trains...

    The long, cold winters must fly by... ;-)
  • edited January 2014
    I only watch it for Loo Brealey...
  • edited January 2014
    I think that this series has been the weakest that they've done. That last one was far to over elaborate.
  • edited January 2014
    Funny, I really enjoyed this series. Best thing on the telly for ages. I'm not a Sherlock geek or a TV/film geek though, I tend not to think too deeply about these things, it's just an enjoyable hour and a half's worth of telly. And at least it's not got stupidly convoluted like Doctor Who lately...
    MatGubbins wrote: »
    I only watch it for Loo Brealey...

    Yes, she is rather lovely isn't she ;)
    The comp.sys.sinclair crap games competition 2015
    "Let's not be childish. Let's play Spectrum games."
  • edited January 2014
    Vampyre wrote: »
    It also doesn't hurt that we get a flash of Watson's luscious legs every now and then either ;-)

    Phew, thought you were on about Martin Freeman for a minute there...
    The comp.sys.sinclair crap games competition 2015
    "Let's not be childish. Let's play Spectrum games."
  • edited January 2014
    I love the Sherlock programmes but I do agree that this series was very different to previous ones, particularly the first two episodes. However, I did embrace the comic style of episode 2 even though it bugged lots of people.

    Did anyone notice at the end of S3E2 after Sherlock played the Waltz that he wrote for Watson and Mary - a shot of the manuscript (as he puts it into an envelope) clearly shows it written in 2/4 and not 3/4. It isn't just the time signature, the notes are too!
  • edited January 2014
    Was that the one last week that was basically just a rehash of the V for Vendetta storyline?
  • edited January 2014
    ewgf wrote: »
    No doubt karingal will be along to rubbish the program now - he'll say "It was awful, so I didn't watch it. A terrible program. Or book. Or drink. Whatever it was that ewgf liked". :lol:
    Absolutely correct.

    I watched it and tried to like it but well...

    Stephen Moffatts scripts and plots are atrocious, holes in the plot you could drive an artic through.
    He always uses the get out of jail card, the one size fits all, dig you out of any hole, plot device. In Doctor Who it's the sonic screwdriver whilst in Sherlock it's the mind palace.
    Both shows could be quite good but both manage to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory because of Stephen Moffatt.
    I wanna tell you a story 'bout a woman I know...
  • edited January 2014
    Was that the one last week that was basically just a rehash of the V for Vendetta storyline?

    I'd just see that as payback for Alan Moore appropriating Moriarty for the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. ;-)
  • edited January 2014
    Does anyone remember that one off comedy called Cruise of The Gods that was on about 10 years ago which a starred Steve Coogan. In it the main joke was that one of the actors had made it big in Hollywood and was the lead in a really bad modern day set Sherlock Holmes called Sherlock Holmes in Miami.

    When i heard that the US were doing a contemporary Sherlock this immediately sprang to mind and top it off with a female Dr Watson and it seemed like it was going to be a right stinker.

    I will say though that it is much better than i anticipated and i think they do a good job although churning out upteen episodes a year will eventually drain it into a run of the mill procedural drama.
  • My favourite Sherlock Holmes is the BBC stuff they put on the wireless.

    Much more atmospheric than moving pictures.
    Cheeky Funster (53)
  • fogfog
    edited January 2014
    meanwhile on bbc4

    timeshift: How to Be Sherlock Holmes - The Many Faces of a Master Detective


    narrated by peter wynguard.. ya know, mr style icon.. jason king
  • zx1zx1
    edited January 2014
    You can't beat the old Basil Rathbone films:smile:
    The trouble with tribbles is.......
  • edited January 2014
    Jeremy Brett, the absolute master
  • edited January 2014
    The best big screen portrayal of Holmes was Sean Connery in The Name Of The Rose. The only thing that had changed was the name...
  • edited January 2014
    Necros wrote: »
    The best big screen portrayal of Holmes was Sean Connery in The Name Of The Rose. The only thing that had changed was the name...

    ...and the fact he was a monk and that it was set in 14th Century Italy. Otherwise EXACTLY the same ;)

    Just thought I'd also say that I whilst I think BC is a very good Sherlock I do agree with others who said that Jeremy Brett was the best Holmes. Plus there's the fact that I met him when I was a kid, which was quite mind-blowing at the time, especially when he asked me what my favourite Holmes story was. I probably mentioned that in some other thread at some point but it's worth another mention :lol:
Sign In or Register to comment.