Daily Mail claim amateur sleuth has unmasked Jack The Ripper
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2746321/Jack-Ripper-unmasked-How-amateur-sleuth-used-DNA-breakthrough-identify-Britains-notorious-criminal-126-years-string-terrible-murders.html
Even if it is true the second stain could have been put on hours/days before the first seeming as she was a brass and probably entertained a dozen gentlemen a day.
Even if it is true the second stain could have been put on hours/days before the first seeming as she was a brass and probably entertained a dozen gentlemen a day.
Post edited by festershinetop on
Comments
its not like the guy doing the testing could possibly gain anything finacially. :-D
As has been mentioned though, going by her chosen profession, it's quite possible that Kosminsky had "relations" with her at some point. But, at least this guy is more believable than some of the suspects that have come up over the years, two of my favourites are JILL The Ripper and Lewis Carrol :-)
Please tell me that was a quote from Brass Eye or something.
IMMIGRANTS!
LOL
Coming over here, stealing our serial killers' jobs...
"DBL means Dusty Blonde Lulu, and that's a male paedophile disguised as a lion" :-P
Far from conclusive IMO.
No, its referring to a letter they willingly published 26 June 1997.
Apart from that, ok so you can test for degraded mitochondrial DNA, but can you say with any certainty that it was from November 1888 or 1921 or last week? As with any other scientific finding it has to be replicated by someone else before its universally accepted.
We can't be sure form now but this looks quite serious attempt.
The only surprise is that the Mail didn't claim that Kosminski didn't play video games...
Yeah, and then lock him up. :-D
Scotland yard always gets its man.
Oh, you mean the one from Peter Tatchell where he said paedophilia was "impossible to condone"?
Yes, you've got them bang to rights there. ;-)
Would you prefer that they willingly censored it? If you search for this letter -by Peter Tatchell - online you will find that it is kept alive 17 years on by the BNP, and they too have published it in full.
You would have to be really stupid to make the assumption that either the Guardian or the BNP are pro-paedo just because they have chosen to publish the opinion of a public figure, the moreso in the Guardian's case as Tatchell's letter is an attack on a opposite opinion previously published in the same newspaper.
http://www.petertatchell.net/lgbt_rights/age_of_consent/Under-age-sex-Statement-of-clarification-by-Peter-Tatchell.htm
I tell ya, back in my 20s I was obsessed with old Jack - being a Londoner and all.
For those in the know - Aaron Kosminski was the only suspect ever identified back in the day by an eye-witness, and was also the lead suspect of two high ranking police officers and the lead detective on the street (Donald Swanson, not Michael Caine).
Lol - thinking about it - I had a game included on the Sam Coupe 'Fred' diskzine under the mysterious title of M.J.D Productions. It stood for Montague John Druitt - another pathetic suspect unfairly treated throughout the century.
Well well well. Aaron, you old fruit, you.
My favourite suspect was always the Elephant Man who was in residence just round the corner at the time. He just looked shifty.
Tobo
The Fail true to form!! :)
Secondly to suggest that the Guardian worse than the Mail because it is "pro paedo" is hilarious. When did the Guardian last publish photos of a 15 year old in a short dress or swimsuit for its readers to letch at? :lol:
Is she the one who said she'd quit being an author if she was proved wrong?
They shouldn't have printed it or any of the other insane ramblings from a man who campaigns to make sex with children legal.
Why not?
Are you scared that you might accidentally read something that makes you think?