NASA Mars Rovers faked?
Recently discovered this from this video here.
Apparently, the Mars rover's Opportunity/Curiosity, is in Alaska, NOT Mars. There are two possibilities. Either, there are NASA photo's which show earthly objects and life from Earth, or there is evidence of life on Mars which NASA don't care about.
The second possibility is just stupid, because the whole point of the rover's is to find evidence of life.
Why aren't NASA whooping and cheering for finding a Crinoid fossil on Mars? Or even a more astounding living Alaskan Arctic Lemming on Mars?
Who believes, AFTER watching the film above, that the Mars rover's are on Mars and not Earth?
Apparently, the Mars rover's Opportunity/Curiosity, is in Alaska, NOT Mars. There are two possibilities. Either, there are NASA photo's which show earthly objects and life from Earth, or there is evidence of life on Mars which NASA don't care about.
The second possibility is just stupid, because the whole point of the rover's is to find evidence of life.
Why aren't NASA whooping and cheering for finding a Crinoid fossil on Mars? Or even a more astounding living Alaskan Arctic Lemming on Mars?
Who believes, AFTER watching the film above, that the Mars rover's are on Mars and not Earth?
You do not have permission to view polls.
Post edited by FrankT on
Comments
Simply don't have time.
I'd maybe like to though I like a good conspiracy/comparison of "facts", but nope not enough hours in the day to indulge in this one...
As for where those rovers are? They're all over the place. There was one in Leicester until not so long ago. Doesn't mean there aren't any on Mars as well though.
- IONIAN-GAMES.com -
Faked photos or fake mission.
If the official NASA photos are to be believed, there is a living Lemming on Mars, which appears on one photo, and not on another taken of the same area at a different time. A sea creature fossils on rocks. And a man's shadow leaning over the rover to clean its panels when it got too dirty. There are a couple of photo's of men on Mars cleaning the Mars rover panels now. How gullable do they think we are?
That's what I think.
My ZX Art Music Page
Carlos Michelis Theme
@luny@mstdn.games
https://www.luny.co.uk
Someone here's certainly gullible...
richard d hall was an engineer for NEI/Rolls Royce for 16 years, can't be that amateur. I like his vids tbh. straight ahead, no reptiles/illuminate nonsense. sometimes he goes a bit too far down the rabbit hole for my liking, but he's not standard youtube tin foil hat fare... imo
I'm sure he was in the seat behind be when I went to watch starwars.....
Download the latest version of Bomb Munchies Ver2210 4th July 2020
And who released these photos of these men cleaning the panels and one containing a lemming?
Obviously, much clearer / higher quality imaging is available at Nasa's own website - but for the most part, I've never seen anything remotely fake-worthy, or unusual in the 'smoke and mirrors' sense of the phrase.
Nonetheless - there are a lot of amazing, and beautiful landscapes to view on Mars, buuuuuut I ain't seen any pyramids, lemmings, yetis, shadow-dancers, Slenderman, etc, etc... And believe me, I'd be stoked if the rover discovered something of a truly 'oooooer!' nature on the surface - but so far, I just have to settle for the beauty and wonder of Mars itself, in all it's amazing glory / detail!
My tuppence! :)
Never British rail and their faking of "the wrong type of snow" or "leaves on the line" etc...
In WW2 they had a proto GPS system that only used ground based towers.
It was called Loran, then it used in the Vietnam war and the accuracy was upgraded to the same as modern day GPS.
GPS signals are around 1.2ghz to 1.3ghz there are these clouds that appear sometimes called noctilucent clouds ,people send in photos of them to the BBC and they are shown,nthese clouds are highly reflective to the same frequency as GPS 1.2ghz
So if there were satellites their signals would bounce off these clouds into space.
Signals can be transmitted large distances by bouncing off the ionosphere or troposphere.
Alaska was covered with a network called 'white alice' which used signals bounced off the troposphere. Very few stations were used.
Shortwave radio can be transmitted thousand of kilometres using the ionosphere. This is how boat captains are a!ways allowed to use the radio to call for help.
So basically there is no need for satellites, Google is using airships to beam wifi into remote areas because satellites don't even make economical sense.
Everything that satellites claim to do can be achieved with towers,we certainly see a lot of towers everywhere.
Weather satellites produce the same images as Doppler radar towers on the ground.
- IONIAN-GAMES.com -
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA16204.jpg
There's not a lot of towers in the middle of oceans, or jungles, or deserts, or yorkshire...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia
The gullible ones are not the people who make these theory's up but the people who believe them.
JSpeccy-win32-portable
As mentioned, shortwave radio works in the middle of any ocean, no satellites involved.
Other atmospheric bouncing techniques have been discovered since the invention of shortwave radio too.
The GPS system used in WW2 (LORAN) relied on towers built on land, but worked over the whole Atlantic.
Only seven towers were needed for this,one in Greenland one in the UK, some in the US and some in Canada.
When it comes to verbal arguments though the conspiracy theorists always "win" debates for the same reason religious nutters do. Any evidence that contradicts their wild accusations has been fabricated as part of the conspiracy so therefore doesn't count.
Exactly what I thought