[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220548]
you can use ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220555]Ops, I forgot to ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220563]The string looks correct. ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220520]Now notice that if ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220575]Here's the bug! ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220602]IMHO it's more ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220602]
Correct. We have ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220617]BTW here's one way to do it:

[CODE]
...
NEXT i:
LET k=INT(z/9-.2):
PRINT AT k+k,z+z-18*k-4;PAPER 3;" " AND i

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220638]Ops! This is going ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220520]Notice that if we ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220646]OK, that's enough ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220617][CODE]
...
NEXT i:
LET k=INT(z/9-.2):
PRINT AT k+k,z+z-18*k-4;PAPER 3;" " AND i

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220655]
use this

[CODE]
LET q=i
[/CODE]
[/QUOTE]

I should have mentioned that the statement above should go right after the IF-THEN statement!

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220655]Here's one.
< ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220673]Here's another idea.< ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220663]OK, here's the ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;220666]Indeed :)

Since ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;221085]Instead of this

[CODE]
(qi)
[/CODE]

use this

[CODE]
(q-i)
[/CODE][/QUOTE]

Nice catch, so we have (q=i) and (q-i) for future equal and unequal tests

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;221083]Good catch!

... 2 characters.

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;221085]Instead of this
But, yes for the case Einar pointed out, and many others ...

... suggested optimisations.

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;221174]One option is the ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;221185]
OK, here's ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;221215]It's a clever ... this.[/QUOTE]

OK Einar, That's fine by me ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;221431]Another trivial example is ... memory).
[/QUOTE]

Einar,

I am working ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;221588]
My conclusion is ... here :)[/QUOTE]

Thanks Einar, that was fascinating reading! This ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;221649]Thanks! Frankly I never ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;221687]Excellent idea, thank you ... .[/QUOTE]

Thanks again Einar,

Let's say ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;221734]I suggest 2 different ... with you on this point Einar. I was myself starting to ...

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;221843]Perhaps the opposite order ...

[QUOTE=Dr BEEP;221922]This test

[code]
LET z=CODE " 2j+qX=0-ol_D?ZB]HT\@[QAKOF/.nmVMYPG>^ULC9876fedcka4,ph;1:bg5 "(i)-31+(a*9+b+1)*(a>0)*(b>0)*(b0 for the same reason we can't skip b

[QUOTE=Einar Saukas;221978]Great idea! I bet ...